Male Scent Molecules May Be Compromising Biomedical Research 274
sciencehabit (1205606) writes "Scientists have found that mice feel 36% less pain when a male researcher is in the room, versus a female researcher. The rodents are also less stressed out. The effect appears to be due to scent molecules that male mammals (including humans, dogs, and cats) have been emitting for eons. The finding could help explain why some labs have trouble replicating the results of others, and it could cause a reevaluation of decades of animal experiments: everything from the effectiveness of experimental drugs to the ability of monkeys to do math. Male odor could even influence human clinical trials."
Molecules shmolecules (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Written by a Woman? (Score:5, Insightful)
Did you bother to actually read the article?
The results were quite simple. No odor, or just female odor = 1 result. Male odor = another result.
Simple logic would then equate female odor = no effect (simply because the female odor had the same effect as no odor at all).
So therefore, the male odor was causing a change in the results of the experiment.
Re:Only compromised if you're doing bad science (Score:2, Insightful)
No, if I try to reproduce your study, but your lab had a male animal handler and mine didn't, I may get different results.
"Presence of male human" was not previously thought to be something that had to be controlled for.