Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Biotech Medicine United Kingdom

UK Government Proposes Rules To Allow 'Three-Parent Embryos' 146

Posted by Unknown Lamer
from the meet-my-nine-parents dept.
sciencehabit writes "The U.K. government today issued proposed regulations that would allow researchers to try a new and controversial in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure in patients. The technique could allow women who are carriers of mitochondrial disease to have healthy, genetically related children. But it also transfers DNA from one egg or embryo into another, a form of genetic alteration that could be passed on to future generations. Altering the genes of human egg cells or embryos in IVF procedures is now forbidden in the United Kingdom."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

UK Government Proposes Rules To Allow 'Three-Parent Embryos'

Comments Filter:
  • by jeffb (2.718) (1189693) on Thursday February 27, 2014 @03:46PM (#46361841)

    This is a solution doesn't just allow such women to have healthy, genetically related children. It frees their lineage from the disease. Implement this fix in one generation, and the children, grandchildren, and all their progeny are disease-free.

    I find it incredibly offensive to say that women should be forced to condemn their children to suffer from a preventable disease, or be prevented from bearing genetically-related children, simply because some people think the cure is "unnatural".

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 27, 2014 @03:58PM (#46361949)

    I find it incredibly offensive to say that women should be forced to condemn their children to suffer from a preventable disease,

    Then don't have kids. It's still an elective choice.

    or be prevented from bearing genetically-related children, simply because some people think the cure is "unnatural".

    By its very definition of how it's done is unnatural and the long term consequences to the gene pool unknown.

  • No big deal (Score:4, Interesting)

    by wonkey_monkey (2592601) on Thursday February 27, 2014 @05:55PM (#46363351) Homepage

    My DNA is already a mis-mash of genes from millions of ancestors. What would one more matter?

No line available at 300 baud.

Working...