Psychologists: Internet Trolls Are Narcissistic, Psychopathic, and Sadistic 293
Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Chris Mooney reports at Slate that research conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba confirmed that people who engage in internet trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others). In the study, trolls were identified in a variety of ways. One was by simply asking survey participants what they 'enjoyed doing most' when on online comment sites, offering five options: 'debating issues that are important to you,' 'chatting with others,' 'making new friends,' 'trolling others,' and 'other.' The study recruited participants from Amazon's Mechanical Turk website and two measures of sadistic personality were administered (PDF): the Short Sadistic Impulse Scale and the Varieties of Sadistic Tendencies Scale. Only 5.6 percent of survey respondents actually specified that they enjoyed 'trolling.' By contrast, 41.3 percent of Internet users were 'non-commenters,' meaning they didn't like engaging online at all. So trolls are, as has often been suspected, a minority of online commenters, and an even smaller minority of overall Internet users. Overall, the authors found that the relationship between sadism and trolling was the strongest, and that indeed, sadists appear to troll because they find it pleasurable. 'Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others. Sadists just want to have fun ... and the Internet is their playground!' The study comes as websites are increasingly weighing steps to rein in trollish behavior but the study authors aren't sure that fix is a realistic one. 'Because the behaviors are intrinsically motivating for sadists, comment moderators will likely have a difficult time curbing trolling with punishments (e.g., banning users),' says Buckels. 'Ultimately, the allure of trolling may be too strong for sadists, who presumably have limited opportunities to express their sadistic interests in a socially-desirable manner.' Perhaps posting rights should only be unlocked if you pass a test."
Oh, great! now what! (Score:5, Funny)
There is a way to reduce trolling... (Score:5, Funny)
'Ultimately, the allure of trolling may be too strong for sadists, who presumably have limited opportunities to express their sadistic interests in a socially-desirable manner.'
All we need to do is to create opportunities for the sadists to torture people in real life, and they will leave our precious internet alone.
Sadists are misunderstood (Score:5, Funny)
Those guys at Microsoft make great software (Score:3, Funny)
In regards to the article I hate to say
Boy, those guys at Microsoft sure know how to make great software. The fact is no other browser at work displays content right like IE 6. It is the best browser! Infact, the W3C is implementing things IE 6 had for years like rich text controls and displaying the box model ... the RIGHT WAY!
Also I have to tell you McAffee and Norton are soo great and a real pleasure to use for the best OS in the world. Nothing makes me all in the mood when I have to see the pleasure of seeing a scan pop up during a lovely reboot but these wonderful products.
In addition, FSF are a bunch of radical socialists from the Obama administration out to destroy your freedom. Just look at GCC and how RMS's radical views on commercial software made sure these tools can never be included in another program like kdevelop or Netbeans. I actually do not write software but think I know everything and like to chat crap from other people so I can laugh at all the responses HAHAH.
This is why only BSD is the only true license etc and only vi should be used to read any licensing terms. Anyone who disagree's is an idiot, socialist, Obama voter, and needs to have lots of replies here and go waaay offtopic.
Sincerely,
Patrick Bateman.
Re:Survey results != Real world (Score:5, Funny)
such as the poor speling or grammars of the postes that your are replying to
Was that on purpose?
Are you on the receiving end of spelling trolls? :)
what is your point? (Score:0, Funny)
Machiavellianism
narcissism
psychopathy
sadism
Hillary is now a Democrat.
Re:Survey results != Real world (Score:4, Funny)
I will contend that a majority of persistent "trolls" would not necessarily answer on a survey that they enjoy trolling.
You make a lot of great points. I would add -- internet "trolling" is often the result of an anonymous or pseudonymous environment, where you are held less accountable for your actions. It's like the people who are happy to lay on the horn in their car or aggressively tailgate someone (or slow down to "teach someone a lesson"), but they would never randomly scream at someone who was walking too slow on the street or cut in front of them on a sidewalk and start walking slowly. Anonymity changes behavior.
I'd say that anyone capable of aggressive anonymous driving behavior (which seems to be a LOT of folks, perhaps the majority of people at some point, depending on stress level) is also capable of trolling on the internet.
Those people who actually self-identify as "trolls" in such a study are probably primarily either real outliers or people who actually aren't really trolls all the time, but found it amusing to select such a non-conformist choice (see your average Slashdot poll). Thus, the data may also be skewed by people who aren't primarily trolls but have other personality traits that led them to make an unusual choice in an internet poll.
Re:Sadists are misunderstood (Score:4, Funny)
Its time to give sadists a fair crack of the whip!
Re:Sadists are misunderstood (Score:3, Funny)
I'd give you a cookie, except I'm not sure you deserve it.
Can you please calibrate my sarcasm detector?
Re:so are republicans... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Sadists are misunderstood (Score:3, Funny)
Can you please calibrate my sarcasm detector?
Are you asking whether you've been trolled or not?
Re:Oh, great! now what! (Score:4, Funny)
Trolls enjoy it if you react to them. If you talk TO them.
They hate it if you talk ABOUT them while ignoring them entirely, treating them like the lab rats they should be.
Re:Survey results != Real world (Score:4, Funny)
A one-man show of Moby Dick is NOT a lecture on whale hunting. It is quite sadistic though.
Re:Survey results != Real world (Score:2, Funny)
(5) "Troll" is lingo --- you may have people who enjoy trolling, who have absolutely no idea what the word 'Troll' means.
And, generally speaking, what it really means is "someone who says something that I don't like." I wonder if this study even bothered to define the term, and if so, if it's a measurable definition.
Re:Authenticate commentors with some physical medi (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Happy Saturday from The Golden Girls! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:New Study! (Score:5, Funny)
The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can't. Not without your help. But you're not helping.
Re:Libertarians (Score:-1, Funny)
You mistake is assuming that class divisions exist because of tyranny. It actually exists because of choice.
We have a government that takes away from the rich and give to the poor because the rich and poor are both there by choice.
The rich desire to be rich, which is fine, and we create a government that allows them to be rich by taxing them more as they gain more wealth. We use the taxes to pay for the services they need to become rich, such as education (need to make sure their employees can speak english and follow math instructions), roads (need to make sure their company goods can be transported), the military (need to protect their resources), patents (need to allow them a monopoly on their ideas), and basically every single function of government.
It is government that allows one to be wealthy.
Don't believe me?
Take away a function of government, and see how much it damages the wealthy.
That includes things like all social services (unemployment, health care, retirement, etc..) that you mistakenly assume benefit the lazy, but actually exist because it benefits the wealthy.
Really, the precious snowflake libertarians exist because they are ignorant of the overall system. It is amusing when we liberal statists watch these precious snowflake libertarians talk about their rights and freedoms and other dumb retarded shit we feed them to work harder, when we know exactly why they are mistaken and laugh at them.
These idiots actually think the money they earned is because of their hard work. LOL.
They have no idea about the Matrix we liberal statists built for them.
You're welcome.