Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science Idle

Dogs Defecate In Alignment With Earth's Magnetic Field 222

Daniel_Stuckey writes "But for whatever its worth, all that spinning is far from arbitrary. What dog owners witness is a small and furry version of the aurora borealis and a link between species and environment that's as holistic and beautiful as a dog pooping can be. A team of Czech and German researchers found that dogs actually align themselves with the Earth's magnetic field when they poop. Proving at least that they're really devoted to their work, the researchers measured the direction of the body axis of 70 dogs from 37 breeds during 1,893 defecations and 5,582 urinations over the course of two years, and found that dogs "prefer to excrete with the body being aligned along the North-south axis under calm magnetic field conditions." They fittingly published their results [abstract] in the journal Frontiers in Zoology ."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Dogs Defecate In Alignment With Earth's Magnetic Field

Comments Filter:
  • by goombah99 ( 560566 ) on Thursday January 02, 2014 @07:18PM (#45851439)

    I suspect the dogs just don't like staring into the sun then they poo. I'd also speculate that since streets and walls tend to be aligned with the cardinal directions there's an overall alignment augmentation due to their surroundings. finally if they like to poo in a shadow of a tree then likely they may face back to the tree and thus have a bias to north or south alignments.

  • Re:wow (Score:5, Insightful)

    by bob_super ( 3391281 ) on Thursday January 02, 2014 @07:26PM (#45851533)

    But they have secured next year's igNobel...

  • Re:wow (Score:5, Insightful)

    by plopez ( 54068 ) on Thursday January 02, 2014 @07:32PM (#45851609) Journal

    What do you think grad students are for?

  • by jslarve ( 1193417 ) on Thursday January 02, 2014 @07:42PM (#45851773)
    They really don't.
  • by Daniel Dvorkin ( 106857 ) on Thursday January 02, 2014 @07:59PM (#45851961) Homepage Journal

    Why do we insist on speculating that animals have all of these magical abilities, like the ability to tell which way is north, ability to tell when an earthquake is coming, ability to tell when a person has cancer, etc. Humans are animals too, and yet we can't do any of these things (without tools). Frankly, I think the people who say animals can do these things are just full of crap.

    Different species have different senses, and levels of senses. Your eyesight is much, much keener than a dog's, although not as good as an eagle's; your sense of smell is much better than the eagle's, but nowhere near as good as the dog's. And the way brains with very different structures process the information is different too. Is that really so difficult to believe?

  • by Em Adespoton ( 792954 ) <slashdotonly.1.adespoton@spamgourmet.com> on Thursday January 02, 2014 @09:07PM (#45852509) Homepage Journal

    I have 2 dogs. When they pee at the same time, they always do it at right angles to each other...

    One of them obviously likes flux closure domains....

    I wonder if they did the study with multiple dogs peeing at the same time. This could be your opportunity to publish a follow-up PhD in Zoology!

  • by dbIII ( 701233 ) on Thursday January 02, 2014 @09:22PM (#45852633)

    Why do we insist on speculating that animals have all of these magical abilities

    This is the opposite - trying to work out more about senses instead of putting it all down to magic.

    ability to tell when a person has cancer

    They smell different and dogs are better at smelling than us. That's all it is. Sensors can be used instead of dogs now that it has been worked out what the dogs are smelling.

    Frankly, I think the people who say animals can do these things are just full of crap.

    Finding stuff in the dark looks like magic too until echo location is described.

  • by radarskiy ( 2874255 ) on Thursday January 02, 2014 @09:44PM (#45852813)

    I propose that when someone comments "They should have considered X" when the article does consider X those of us who read the article should be allowed to punch that commenter in the face. They won't understand any response more subtle than that,

  • Re:Patent Pending (Score:5, Insightful)

    by roc97007 ( 608802 ) on Thursday January 02, 2014 @11:49PM (#45853545) Journal

    You're oversharing again.

  • by umafuckit ( 2980809 ) on Friday January 03, 2014 @11:29AM (#45856653)
    This is biology. A standard deviation of 100 degrees is not at all surprising for a study such as this and on its own is not enough to write off the result. The study may be BS for other reasons, but a large SD isn't one of them. Look at the first figure in the paper (http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/pdf/1742-9994-10-80.pdf) The clustering around N/S is pretty impressive for the 0% magnetic declination. What I don't understand, however, is why the relationship falls apart when magnetic declination is non-zero. I don't see why that should happen and it makes me think the effect is BS.

A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth

Working...