Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Science Politics

Citizen Science: Who Makes the Rules? 189

New submitter UnderCoverPenguin writes "At MakeZine, David Lang talks about the some of the legal issues around a planned, amateur science 'expedition,' as well as some other amateur science projects. In the not too distant past, most science was amateur. Over the past 20 or so years, society has been making it harder for amateurs to do real science, despite the technical costs falling. With the recent upswing of the 'maker movement,' amateur science has seen an increase as well, but is running into an assortment of legal issues. (An exception is astronomy, where amateurs continue to play important roles. Of course, astronomy doesn't involve chemicals or other (currently) 'scary stuff.') Can amateur science make a come-back? Or are the legal obstacles too entrenched?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Citizen Science: Who Makes the Rules?

Comments Filter:
  • by presidenteloco ( 659168 ) on Monday December 30, 2013 @02:48AM (#45816391)

    The fact that scientific knowledge, in the form of scientific articles, is locked behind exorbitant journal paywalls is what is preventing amateur science the most, not to mention would be professional science in places that can't afford the outlandish subscription fees.

    It's a crime against humanity preventing what is often publicly funded scientific knowledge from being shared far and wide, as it could be with virtually no cost on the Internet.

    This is a shameful state of affairs that needs to be fixed one way or the other. Long live Aaron!

  • by chrismcb ( 983081 ) on Monday December 30, 2013 @03:01AM (#45816429) Homepage
    The article begins:

    For a group of citizen explorers, without an affiliation to a scientific institution, this is a daunting endeavor.

    I think this could just be amended to "For a group of scientists this is a daunting endeavor." Of course scientists attached to a legal institution can probably draw on the help of other resources and people who know how to jump through some of these hoops. But they still have to deal with the same legal issues.

  • by icebike ( 68054 ) on Monday December 30, 2013 @03:50AM (#45816545)

    Wire, of any kind, watches, clocks, cell phones, and various things found under your kitchen sink all become bomb making supplies when the police want to hold you for any reason what so ever. Your kids backpack, your pressure cooker, your stash of nails and screws, gas for the lawn mower, the tank for the gas grill, all can get you held for 72 hours.

    Mere possession of these materials can get you charged. You are already guilty.

  • by golden age villain ( 1607173 ) on Monday December 30, 2013 @04:04AM (#45816579)

    no it can't because amateurs can't do things rigorously enough to meet the 5 sigma thresholds.

    Most professional scientists never meet the 5 sigma threshold either.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 30, 2013 @05:37AM (#45816859)

    The real problem with "amateur" science isn't necessarily the 5 sigma threshold but the arrogance of the people involved.

    Most of the "makers" I've met think that programming a raspberry pi is 2 steps removed from curing brain cancer and that acadeeeeeemia is just a rat's nest of warring fiefdoms who should be done away with because they don't actually contribute anything.

  • Ammoniacal (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 30, 2013 @07:23AM (#45817181)

    I'm a second year biochemistry student who's had a lifelong passion for chemistry. I've slowly built myself a lab over the years, where I've mostly been making or purifying OTC chemicals to common lab reagents. One day I came across an old paper claiming high yields of acetonitrile when using calcium carbide as a dehydrating agents instead of phosphorus pentoxide. I've talked to quite a few people having problems finding phosphorus pentoxide, or it just being too expensive to use. So being the curious person I am, I thought I'd try both agents and report my yields on the forums. Because I wanted good numbers, I decided to buy some acetamide instead if making it. The only other reagent you use in the distillation. Simply ordered a 250 g jar off ebay, but the order never arrived. Four months later I receive a phone call by the police, interrogating me about the contents of the package, and my intentions with it. I invented a little half-lie on the spot, said I used it for a curing bath for photographic film. A month later I do receive it, labeled "Seized by customs". But now I'm afraid to do anything, expecting them to be at my door at any moment, to see what I'm "really" using it for. So I close down my "lab" temporarily, pack it all into some cases and put them for storage. The next week I get another call from the police, this time from an investigator on "my case". Asking about the amounts I had used, and for what. Etc.

    And now I don't know what to do anymore. And all this for acetamide, a substance you get when mixing ammonia and "non-acetone nail polish remover", not even a precursor to any drugs (although it can be used to make a precursor), and has no use in either bombs or pyrotechnics.

    Seems like a quick end to a rather short-lived hobby.

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...