Clam That Was Killed Determining Its Age Was Over 100 Years Older Than Estimated 366
schwit1 writes "In 2006, climate change experts from Bangor University in north Wales found a very special clam while dredging the seabeds of Iceland. At that time scientists counted the rings on the inside shell to determine that the clam was the ripe old age of 405. Unfortunately, by opening the clam which scientists refer to as 'Ming,' they killed it instantly. Cut to 2013, researchers have determined that the original calculations of Ming's age were wrong, and that the now deceased clam was actually 102 years older than originally thought. Ming was 507 years old at the time of its demise."
Just like the bristlecone pines (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:7 Years (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:mankind is a cancer (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Scientists also killed the oldest living organi (Score:4, Interesting)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_(tree) [wikipedia.org]
Re:Wow, this _is_ kind of a shame (Score:5, Interesting)
The oldest animal on Earth that we know of was killed. I'm sure there's lots of older stuff out there that we just aren't aware of.
Hush. Now someone is going to go out, find it and kill it. Then probably say, "Yeah, that clam wasn't theoldest living animal. This was."
Cheers,
Dave
Re:Climate Scientists (Score:4, Interesting)
So because a handful of scientists killed a clam to get some information about it all climate scientists are incompetent? Seriously.
Re:Non-destructive testing (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Shame on them (Score:2, Interesting)
Clam shells provide accurate historical temperature data. The problem with using a free shell is that you don't known how old it is.
By having a living one they now that the last "ring" is now.
From what I have heard clam shells are accurate down to a degree so this shell could indicate if there actually have been a several degree temperature rise the last 500 years.