Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science

Un-Un-Pentium On Your Periodic Table of the Elements? 172

PolygamousRanchKid writes, quoting Forbes "Researchers at Sweden's Lund University have announced that they've been able to confirm the existence of element 115 on the periodic table. This research team isn't the first to create element 115, which is currently known as ununpentium. The first claim that ununpentium had been synthesized in a lab was by a joint group of Russian and American researchers, who believed that they created it in their lab in 2004."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Un-Un-Pentium On Your Periodic Table of the Elements?

Comments Filter:
  • Jokes (Score:5, Insightful)

    by suso ( 153703 ) * on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @10:13AM (#44696225) Journal

    If you want to make a lot of stupid jokes about the Pentium chip, don't worry, they were already made 10 years ago in the other Slashdot article [slashdot.org]

  • so... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by JustNiz ( 692889 ) on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @10:14AM (#44696233)

    what is it actually good for?

  • Re:so... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mwvdlee ( 775178 ) on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @10:24AM (#44696325) Homepage

    It's good for getting closer to the predicted island of stability, where stable (and usable) elements may exists.

    It's also good for satisfying human curiosity (which in itself is a worthy goal) and being a catalyst for inventing new technology that may be of practical value already.

  • Re:so... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gstoddart ( 321705 ) on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @10:28AM (#44696361) Homepage

    what is it actually good for?

    Understanding the world around us? You know, sciency stuff.

    Nobody is going to make you a car out of this, but some of these 'exotic' materials they need to create in a lab can tell us some interesting things about the early universe.

    Since when do we need a specific reason to do science? You never know what you'll find out once you've done the research.

  • Re:so... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by RaceProUK ( 1137575 ) on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @10:57AM (#44696655)

    Since when do we need a specific reason to do science? You never know what you'll find out once you've done the research.

    Since we started implementing austerity measures.

    Just because the banks lost all our money down the back of the sofa doesn't mean we shouldn't do science.

  • Re:so... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Charliemopps ( 1157495 ) on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @11:17AM (#44696843)

    From what I understand, the "island of stability" in terms of super-heavy elements is a relative term - it just means the decay of elements in the island of stability is measured in maybe hundreds of milliseconds instead of a few microseconds.

    they are expected to have radioactive decay half-lives of at least minutes or days as compared to seconds, with some optimists expecting half-lives of millions of years

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability

    The answer is, we don't know for sure. That's why we're trying to get there. If their half life is anything longer than a few minutes they would revolutionize chemistry.

  • Re:so... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @12:50PM (#44697759)

    You may have noticed a general lack of gigantic world wars since 1945?

    Don't know about you, but I've noticed a gigantic world war since about the turn of the millennium...
    And the rich are winning.

Ya'll hear about the geometer who went to the beach to catch some rays and became a tangent ?

Working...