Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
NASA Mars

NASA's Curiosity Rover Celebrates One Year On Mars 69

An anonymous reader writes "The Curiosity rover celebrates one year on Mars today. 'The 1-ton robot has achieved a great deal in its 12 months on Mars, discovering an ancient streambed and gathering enough evidence for mission scientists to declare that the planet could have supported microbial life billions of years ago. And more big finds could be in the offing, as Curiosity is now trekking toward its ultimate science destination: the foothills of a huge and mysterious mountain that preserves, in its many layers, a history of Mars' changing environmental conditions.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NASA's Curiosity Rover Celebrates One Year On Mars

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 05, 2013 @06:33PM (#44481505)

    Give an example of something that we SHOULD fix first and where the money spent on this project would have really made a huge difference.

    While we are at it, we should also remove all forms of art and entertainment until we solve all problems. I am sure we could use hollywood budget for something better than a bunch of crapy movies.

  • by amicusNYCL ( 1538833 ) on Monday August 05, 2013 @07:08PM (#44481707)

    In otherowrds, there's tons of better ways to spend all the billions injected into this project.

    Yeah, we would probably be better off spending that $2.5 billion on another 8 or 9 days in Afghanistan (at the low, low price of just $300 million per day).

    Haha, no, I'm only kidding. Only a complete idiot would think that $2.5 billion (which represents 0.06% of the US federal budget for FY 2013) to send an entire science laboratory to another planet is a waste of money. This country is full of money wasters, ground-breaking science missions are not part of those. Look at the defense budget if you want to talk about trimming the fat, not the science budget. The NSA in particular seems to have quite a lot of money that it doesn't need (or shouldn't be using).

  • by joe_frisch ( 1366229 ) on Monday August 05, 2013 @07:22PM (#44481791)

    No one can convince you that it was worth it. That really is the problem.

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...