Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space

Kepler-62 Has 2 Good Candidate Planets In the Search for Life 79

astroengine writes "About 1,200 light-years from Earth, five planets are circling around sun-like star Kepler-62, two of which are fortuitously positioned for water, if any exists, to remain liquid on their surfaces — a condition believed to be necessary for life. The discovery, made by scientists using NASA's planet-hunting Kepler space telescope, is the strongest evidence yet for more than one Earth-sized planet existing in a star's so-called 'habitable' zone. 'We're particularly delighted to find that there are two planets in the habitable zone,' lead Kepler scientist William Borucki, with NASA's Ames Research Center in California, told Discovery News. 'It sort of doubles our chances of finding that Earth we'd all like to find. When you think about Earth and Mars, if Mars had been a bit larger, if Jupiter hadn't been so close, we'd again have two planets in the habitable zone and maybe we'd have a place to go,' he said." There's also a third planet believed to be a good candidate for hosting water.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Kepler-62 Has 2 Good Candidate Planets In the Search for Life

Comments Filter:
  • Re:That's nice... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 18, 2013 @04:52PM (#43486831)

    I don't know about "never" but you do bring up a point: space is so vast that finding life of any sort of life is going to be a very long process.

    I've been let down by sci-fi. In a Star Trek:Enterprise, it was mentioned (Season 4, IIRC) that Vulcan was 26 light years away. In reality, how many planets that may under the most flexible standards support life within that distance?

    As far as I know it's zero.

    In sci-fi at "Warp" whatever, the universe is teaming with life.

    IN real life even if we could travel at Warp speeds, there's hardly any planets - that we know of today - that can support life within a lifetime of Warp travel. Eight times - TEN times the speed of light is not good enough, I'm afraid.

    We need THOUSANDs of times the speed of light to have a Star Trek or Star Wars type of intergalactic society.

    I'm afraid that humanity is going to be alone for a very very long time - maybe we will never see life on another planet.

    I really hope I'm wrong because I think it would be the coolest thing in the World to find life on another planet and my hopes are on Mars - bacteria or something.

  • Re:That's nice... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by coastwalker ( 307620 ) <.moc.liamtoh. .ta. .reklawtsaoca.> on Thursday April 18, 2013 @05:47PM (#43487363) Homepage

    Human beings are never going to get outside the solar system, the distance is just too great to get them to even the nearest star as bags of cells in water. But there is a reasonable chance that we can both transmit and receive information from other civilizations - all be it completely asynchronously. If we get really good at robots we might be able to seed a few local stars with self repairing robots with a range of science fiction purposes, but we will probably never know if they make it. Our current lifestyle is more likely to lead to human extinction before such grand objectives are attainable however, we are doing a lousy job of ensuring our own long term viability on the earth currently and it doesn't look likely to change soon. Heck its good fun though!

  • Re:That's nice... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by the gnat ( 153162 ) on Thursday April 18, 2013 @06:57PM (#43487861)

    If i were an alien i wouldnt stop here if it was the last out post on life in the universe, except for to steal the precious species that are not like us on this planet. Futhermore if we as so much get out of our solor system i be they would send a big rock toward us or blow up our sun

    What makes you so certain that intelligent, technologically capable alien races don't go through the same problems that we do? At a minimum, it is likely that interstellar travel requires mastery of nuclear energy and metallurgy across the entire periodic table, with all of the environmental risks that implies. Additionally, just to get to the point where they could develop nuclear power would likely require a period of industrialization using cruder organic sources of energy. It's very hard to imagine accomplishing this without any environmental degradation. Given the number of possible ecological catastrophies that could happen along the way, I think we're actually doing reasonably well so far.

  • Re:H2O Obsession.. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 18, 2013 @08:29PM (#43488445)
    • 1. You cannot make long chain molecules with anything other than C, H and O. Go ahead, try to substitute some other atoms.
    • 2. These long chain molecules don't do anything interesting at all if not given liquid H20
    • 3. H2O has other unique properties, such as being strongly bipolar and also being less dense when solid than liquid which means it mixes like crazy instead of forming solid crud at the bottom like other compounds.
    • 4. Earth has all kinds of crazy compounds lying around. Not one of them has managed to form life other than carbon/water.

    If you can come up with some other chemistry that works, go on and tell us. We're all ears. Tell us how liquid methane can form complex compounds. Believe me, you'll have a Nobel prize in record time.

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...