Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
ISS NASA Space Science

ISS Robotic Arm Captures Dragon Capsule 147

Posted by Unknown Lamer
from the capitalists-...-in-space! dept.
puddingebola writes "From the aricle, 'The SpaceX Dragon capsule has been successfully grabbed by the International Space Station, marking the first time a private American space flight has run a supply mission to the orbiting platform. The crew of the ISS snatched Dragon out of orbit ahead of schedule, using the space station's robotic arm to guide the capsule in after its careful approach.' NASA has also posted video of the docking."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

ISS Robotic Arm Captures Dragon Capsule

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @08:29AM (#41606613)

    The issue is energy. Energy (required to reach orbit) is too expensive. The next human revolution will be free (or remarkably cheap) energy. Tesla claimed to have devised a way to capture the energy from the ionosphere. Consider a single lightning strike has enough power to run a 100 watt bulb for 2 months. There's also some promise in the solar and wind energy areas. There's insane amounts of energy all around us. Capturing a fraction of it (cheaply) will change our lives in unimaginable ways and make things like space travel for the common man possible.

  • by stjobe (78285) on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @08:30AM (#41606617) Homepage

    That video... sure isn't action-packed.

    At first I thought I was watching a scene from 2001: A Space Odyssey.

    Like 2001, this video is interesting but slow :)

  • by MightyYar (622222) on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @09:44AM (#41607359)

    It is not hard for me to see how SpaceX could make a good profit and still be cheaper than NASA. I suspect they don't have pensions on their budget. I suspect people work more than 40 hours a week, and without an expectation of overtime. I suspect they don't have 50-year-old facilities scattered throughout states in a way that only makes sense once you consider congressional districts. And finally, if they fail they go out of business. When NASA fails, the schedule slips. I have a feeling that given this incentive, they will manage risk differently...

Force needed to accelerate 2.2lbs of cookies = 1 Fig-newton to 1 meter per second

Working...