Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Biotech AI Science

Computers May Be As Good As (Or Better Than) Human Biocurators 35

Posted by timothy
from the skynet's-nicer-side dept.
Shipud writes "Sequencing the genome of an organism is not the end of a discovery process; rather, it is a beginning. It's the equivalent of discovering a book whose words (genes) are there, but their meaning is yet unknown. Biocurators are the people who annotate genes — find out what they do — through literature search and the supervised use of computational techniques. A recent study published in PLoS Computational Biology shows that biocurators probably perform no better than fully automated computational methods used to annotate genes. It is not clear whether this is because the software is of high quality, or both curators and software need to improve their performance. The author of this blog post uses the concept of the uncanny valley to explain this recent discovery and what it means to both life science and artificial intelligence."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Computers May Be As Good As (Or Better Than) Human Biocurators

Comments Filter:

"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats." -- Howard Aiken

Working...