Battle Brewing Over Labeling of Genetically Modified Food 334
gollum123 writes with this excerpt from the NY Times:
"For more than a decade, almost all processed foods in the United States — cereals, snack foods, salad dressings — have contained ingredients from plants whose DNA was manipulated in a laboratory. Regulators and many scientists say these pose no danger. But as Americans ask more pointed questions about what they are eating, popular suspicions about the health and environmental effects of biotechnology are fueling a movement to require that food from genetically modified crops be labeled, if not eliminated. The most closely watched labeling effort is a proposed ballot initiative in California that cleared a crucial hurdle this month, setting the stage for a probable November vote that could influence not just food packaging but the future of American agriculture. Tens of millions of dollars are expected to be spent on the election showdown. It pits consumer groups and the organic food industry, both of which support mandatory labeling, against more conventional farmers, agricultural biotechnology companies like Monsanto and many of the nation's best-known food brands like Kellogg's and Kraft."
Glow in the dark corn... (Score:0, Funny)
...is some good shit. Don't knock it 'til you've tried it. Yum!
Re:Glow in the dark corn... (Score:5, Funny)
How dare individuals presume to obstruct Monsato's right to maximise monopoly corporate profits?
The right to maximise shareholder value is a founding principal of this nation, and trumps any petty indulgence a person might have about selecting what they ingest.
Capitalism defeated Communism, you know. That's why it's more important than the Bill of Rights that you pinkos cling to.
Re:It is labeled if you know what to look for (Score:2, Funny)