Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Courts Science

The Scientific Method Versus Scientific Evidence In the Courtroom 140

Posted by Soulskill
from the pi-is-exactly-three dept.
An anonymous reader writes "A few months back, the National Research Council and the Federal Judicial Center published the Third Edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, the primary guide for federal judges in the United States trying to evaluate scientific evidence. One chapter in particular, 'How Science Works,' written by David Goodstein (Professor of Physics and Applied Physics at CalTech), has raised the issue of how judges should see science in the courtroom: should they look at science to see if it matches our idealized view of the scientific method, or should they consider the realities of science, where people advocate for their own theories far more than they question them?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Scientific Method Versus Scientific Evidence In the Courtroom

Comments Filter:

"Never ascribe to malice that which is caused by greed and ignorance." -- Cal Keegan

Working...