Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science

Is Middle Age Evolution's Crowning Achievement? 140

Hugh Pickens writes "Reproductive biologist David Bainbridge writes that with the onset of wrinkles, love handles, and failing eyesight we are used to dismissing our fifth and sixth decades as a negative chapter in our lives. However recent scientific findings show just how crucial middle age has been to the success of our species and that with the probable existence of lots of prehistoric middle-aged people, natural selection had plenty to work on. 'We lead an energy-intensive, communication-driven, information-rich way of life, and it was the evolution of middle age that supported this,' writes Bainbridge, adding that middle age is a controlled and preprogrammed process, not of decline, but of development. 'When we think of human development, we usually think of the growth of a fetus or the maturation of a child into an adult. Yet the tightly choreographed transition into middle age is a later but equally important stage in which we are each recast into yet another novel form' — resilient, healthy, energy-efficient and productive. 'The middle aged may not have been able to outrun the prey, but they were really good at working out where it might be hiding and dividing up the spoils afterwards.' Although some critics say that middle age is a construct of the middle aged, Bainbridge asserts that one key role of middle age is the propagation of information. 'All animals inherit a great deal of information in their genes; some also learn more as they grow up. Humans have taken this second form of information transfer to a new level. We are born knowing and being able to do almost nothing. Each of us depends on a continuous infusion of skills, knowledge and customs, collectively known as culture, if we are to survive. And the main route by which culture is transferred is by middle-aged people showing and telling their children — as well as the young adults with whom they hunt and gather — what to do.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is Middle Age Evolution's Crowning Achievement?

Comments Filter:
  • by Cat_Herder_GoatRoper ( 2491400 ) on Saturday April 21, 2012 @11:53AM (#39756273)
    Not buying that outdated knowledge does not persist. For example Religion!
  • Re:Middle Ages (Score:5, Insightful)

    by grahamd0 ( 1129971 ) on Saturday April 21, 2012 @11:56AM (#39756297)
    You seem to have a gross misunderstanding of libertarians.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 21, 2012 @12:00PM (#39756319)

    Sure, without middle age there could be no MILFs. Therefore, middle age is evolution's crowning achievement indeed. QED.

  • Re:Except... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Jessified ( 1150003 ) on Saturday April 21, 2012 @12:16PM (#39756405)

    So really it's grandparents that this article is really getting at. Middle aged for the purpose of having your offspring's offspring survive. That actually makes sense.

    That makes perfect sense when you consider menopause.

    Evolutionarily, when does it ever make sense for a species to "willingly," as it were, make oneself infertile? In our case, the advantage is that the females stop reproducing and focus the remainder of their energy on their current descendants, rather than produce babies up until death and spread the resources thin.

  • by Curunir_wolf ( 588405 ) on Saturday April 21, 2012 @12:22PM (#39756443) Homepage Journal

    Our culture is so old phobic that people just want to bury their heads in the sand.

    Yea, you're right, parts of the US culture is like that, certainly much of the media.

    And that's why we have old guys hitting on twenty something year old women

    Uh, no, dude, that's NOT why.

  • by alen ( 225700 ) on Saturday April 21, 2012 @01:06PM (#39756727)

    it's not reproduction, but having your genes go on

    being alive in middle age means you can take care of your grand kids while their parents work and give them a chance to have more kids. if you look around the cultures with the strong extended family traditions like latinos and asians seem to have more kids

    a lot of the english/irish/italian/ kids can't wait to move halfway across the country as soon as they can. in other cultures where you stay closer to your parents you can have more kids if they help take care of them

  • by IdolizingStewie ( 878683 ) on Saturday April 21, 2012 @01:11PM (#39756757)
    Yes, but if you can live long enough to keep your kid from dying at 15 while he's still showing off trying to get laid, then you've helped to pass on your genes further. If you can watch your grandbabies while your kid is out hunting, you've helped to pass on your genes further. The continuation of your bloodline doesn't stop with your first red-faced, squalling brat.
  • by Dr_Barnowl ( 709838 ) on Saturday April 21, 2012 @01:38PM (#39756955)

    From an evolutionary POV, it should be the older guys hitting on younger women (you might think that I'm above a certain age, I couldn't possibly comment).

    You can only really examine a man for his propensity for success - both culutral and genetic - until he gets out of his twenties. Alas, women have a certain reproductive shelf life. The inbuilt male interest in younger women is a reflection of this - older women are less likely to be fertile, more likely to have troublesome pregnancies, more likely to have children with birth defects. On the other hand, for a man to have reached his forties at all, let alone with all his faculties intact, was no mean feat for much of the history of the human race. A woman would have to weigh this kind of mate in the balance - the advantages of his experience and the proof of his superior genetic quality, versus the possibility that he'll peg out and not be around to provide resources for her - but you can see how a middle aged man is, from an evolutionary point of view, a much better bet than a younger man.

    Perhaps the stereotype of the mid-life crisis is actually just a successful evolutionary strategy that just receives bad press. Or perhaps I'm just sucking on those sour grapes... :-)

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 21, 2012 @02:35PM (#39757347)

    I read a little blurb years ago by a guy who was in the peace core in the Caribbean. In a little village, 200 people or so. There was one really old guy who was eighty or some such. He was long past being able to do much more than gossip and look after small children. Till the day they heard over the radio that a hurricane was coming. Most people didn't really know what a hurricane was, but he did. He'd been through one when he was a young man. And all these years later he knew what to do. He had young men go into the forrest and bring back logs, showed them how to brace the insides of homes. To board up the windows, block the doors. Use rope to tie down the roof. Ordered families to just abandon badly constructed huts. Cut down and remove trees that were likely to come down. People were busy and a little grumpy but did what they were told. Hurricane hit in the middle of the night, 120 mile an hour winds. Most of the poorly constructed houses got knocked down, the ones that were reinforced survived and the people in them. No one died, not in that village. Some other villages, they didn't do anything, and houses fell down, people died.

    So the thing is, the old man had already passed on his genes. By living long he was also able to use and pass on hard won knowledge and thus insure that his children. grand children and great grand children survived.

UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker

Working...