Using Shadows To Measure the Geysers of Enceladus

The Bad Astronomer writes "A lot of folks are posting about the amazing new pictures of the icy moon Enceladus returned from the Cassini spacecraft. However, one of them shows the shadow of the moon across the geyser plumes. This has been seen before, but I suddenly realized how that can help determine the geysers' locations, and I thought Slashdot readers might be interested in the general method."

News for nerds...

[overbaud]

by nerds... " I’ve written about Enceladus about thirty two bajillion times, because it’s fascinating, and photogenic as heck" given just how nerdy this is no doubt it will have fewer responses than more mainstream non nerdy articles on slashdot.

Re:I want my 5 minutes back

[Anonymous Coward]

Here's your five minutes back. The balance of eternity is for people that understand how wondrous this is.

By the way, you are wrong about the "Slashdot whore" part, just so you know. Sites like "Bad Astronomy" qualify as being one of the main reasons Slashdot was created.

Re:I want my 5 minutes back

[jd]

No, he CAN'T have his five minutes back - you know the rules, no refunds on Slashdot except through the complaints department.

"The Bad Astronomer" has been around long enough, and has enough credibility, that anyone who claims he's a karma whore is de-facto neither a nerd nor a geek and should gerroff our collective lawns.

Obvious Geometry is indeed Obvious. This guy, Euclid, wrote some of the Obvious Geometry down and used it as a teaching manual. Nobody had done that before. Everyone in his time knew the rules he was describing (Archimedes regarded them as insultingly simple), but few had understood the fundamentals (what was axiomatic, what was derivative) and absolutely nobody had thought of actually explaining things before. The result of him doing so caused the number of mathematicians and their skills to explode. The learning curve had become dramatically shallower.

This is really no different. Sure, it's basic but the learning curve of WHY it works, HOW it works and WHEN/WHERE it can be used is NOT common knowledge. This makes teaching the relationship of maths and astronomy a cakewalk. I have no objections to more people seeing why geometry and maths are relevant (a common complaint is that they aren't ever used anywhere, but that's because nobody explains why, yes, they are). I regard it as the sole opportunity for turning the world into people who can think for themselves.