Nearby Star May Have More Planets Than Our Solar System 102
The Bad Astronomer writes "HD 10180 is a near-twin of the Sun about 130 light years away. It's known to have at least six planets orbiting it, but a new analysis of the data shows clear indications of three more, for a total of nine! This means HD 10180 has more planets than our solar system. And whether you think Pluto is a planet or not, all nine of these aliens worlds have masses larger than Earth's, putting them firmly in the 'planet' category."
Yes, but... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:mass? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:mass? (Score:5, Informative)
The current IAU definition is (c/o Wikipedia)
Pluto fails because it hasn't cleared its orbit.
Many people don't like the definition for many reasons. Among them, that what constitutes a "clear" orbit is not specified and is arbitrary (no planet has an orbit 100% free of other objects), that the point of 'hydrostatic equilibrium' is also unspecified and arbitrary, and that it only applies to the Solar System ("The Sun" is in there).
More Great Work from Kepler (Score:4, Informative)
---
Extra Solar Planets [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]
Re:mass? (Score:4, Informative)
Yes, there is a 5-order-of-magnitude gap in our solar system, but there are other systems, and they may have celestial bodies that fall within that gap, so clearer terms might be useful.
Since we don't yet know the composition of these other systems (though I think most would grant they should exist), shouldn't the defining be similarly deferred? Make the definition as useful as it needs to be now, tighten it up later when it's clearly inadequate. It's an imperfect process, but it worked before and it will work again (Pluto controversy notwithstanding). "Planet" is a name for a class of objects, and perhaps overly broad, but right now it usefully defines what we know. When we know more, we'll muck with the definition to fit.
Re:HD 10180 Nearby? (Score:5, Informative)
I don't think any object that no human being can visit in their lifetime without defying the laws of physics can be truly said to be "nearby".
You *can* visit it in your lifetime without violating the laws of physics, its just that you cannot visit it in the lifetime of the people observing you from Earth.