Psychic Ability Claim Doesn't Hold Up In New Scientific Experiments 315
Posted
by
timothy
from the pre-imagining-the-counterevidence dept.
from the pre-imagining-the-counterevidence dept.
cold fjord writes with some stunning news from the world of science, excerpting:
"A new study has failed to find evidence that psychic ability is real. Skeptics may scoff at the finding as obvious, but the research is important because it refutes a study published in a psychological journal last year that claimed to find evidence of extrasensory perception. That research, conducted by Daryl Bem of Cornell University, triggered outrage in the psychological community when the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology announced in 2010 that the paper had been accepted for publication." Here's a link to the academic paper.
Re:Not surprising (Score:4, Informative)
You mean like this experiment?
"I. Human-Machine Anomalies"
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/experiments.html [princeton.edu]
Re:RTFA: The peer review was not a double-blind st (Score:2, Informative)
You do realize Non-locality of Mind has already been proven, right?
See the documentary "The Quantum Activist". It features Dr. Amit Goswami, Ph.D, retired, Professor of physics at the University of Oregon's Institute of Theoretical Science for 30 years, so its not like it features some unknown nut-job.
Well worth watching.