Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Tracking Down the First Oxygen Users 109

Posted by samzenpus
from the primordial-home-health-care dept.
sciencehabit writes "None of us would be here today if, billions of years ago, a tiny, single-celled organism hadn't started using oxygen to make a living. Researchers don't know exactly when this happened, or why, but a team of scientists has come closer than ever before to finding out. They've identified the earliest known example of aerobic metabolism, the process of using oxygen as fuel. The discovery may even provide clues as to where the oxygen came from in the first place."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tracking Down the First Oxygen Users

Comments Filter:
  • by K. S. Kyosuke (729550) on Wednesday January 11, 2012 @02:14PM (#38666298)

    In a hydrocarbon atmosphere, you can burn oxygen. All our definitions are oriented around our oxygen-based atmosphere. I'm sure we'd call oxygen 'fuel' if we lived in a hydrocarbon atmosphere and oxygen was the scarcer material.

    Which made a wonderful plot for Isaac Asimov's lovable The Dust of Death [] :) You can tell the guy was a chemist. ;-)

  • At some levels... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by forkfail (228161) on Wednesday January 11, 2012 @02:23PM (#38666426)

    ... the human race shares certain critical traits with these little guys.

    Like them, we're creating a cataclysmic event in the biosphere that will probably wipe ourselves out, but allow the next generation of life to thrive.

    Unlike them, we out to be able to mitigate the impact of our presence, but while we're smart enough to see what we are doing, we don't have the fortitude to change our ways.

  • by The Grim Reefer (1162755) on Wednesday January 11, 2012 @03:01PM (#38666882)

    "My understanding ... is that atmospheric oxygen at levels high enough to sustain oxygen based metabolism came from plants and trees"

    Your understanding is quite wrong.

    By the time there were "plants and trees" the major part of the biosphere already was oxigen dependant.

    The change of the atmosphere from reductive to oxidative predates trees by about two billion years -the start of the proterozoic age is marked about 2.4 billion years ago (with a strong spike around the precambric which still predates trees by about 300 million years).

    It's my understanding that cyanobacteria [] is responsible for initially creating earths oxygen. I can't say I know much about the historical aspect of it. But I used to keep saltwater reef/fish tanks, and it can become a big problem if you do something wrong. It's really nasty slimy algae looking stuff. I used to find in ironic how much many fish keepers despised the stuff, and yet we probably wouldn't be here without it.

  • by Samantha Wright (1324923) on Wednesday January 11, 2012 @03:15PM (#38667046) Homepage Journal
    Oxygen is the most aggressively electronegative element after Fluorine. (I think that Neon might be [] even more aggressive if you could ionize it usefully.) I had a colourful mnemonic for this in second-year organic chemistry that revolved around bitches and gimps, but the take-home message is that Chlorine robs Nitrogen, and Oxygen wipes out everything but good ol' Fluorine. For related reasons, fluorine becomes a source of face-melting death in hydrogen-bonded form.

The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected. -- The Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972