FDA Backtracks On Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Proposal 172
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The FDA recognized, 35 years ago, that feeding animals low-doses of certain antibiotics used in human medicine — namely, penicillin and tetracyclines — could promote antibiotic-resistant bacteria capable of infecting people who eat meat, and proposed to withdraw approval for the use of those antibiotics in animal feed. Instead of acting upon the proposal, the FDA has now withdrawn it. Although admitting that it continues to have 'concerns' about the safety of the use of antibiotics in animal feed, the FDA says that it will just continue to rely on 'voluntary self-policing' by the industry, the same method which hasn't worked out too well during the past 35 years, as antibiotic use in livestock and antibiotic resistance have continued to rise throughout the entire period."
Easy. (Score:0, Funny)
Don't eat meat.
This is an experiment right? (Score:5, Funny)
Trying to dissprove the concept of "tragedy of the commons"?
You know how to tell if someone is a vegetarian? (Score:4, Funny)
You know how to tell if someone is a vegetarian?
They will tell you.
Re:Greed (Score:3, Funny)
which is vastly healthier than not eating meat
This is not true. There is nothing inherently superior nutritionally in eating meat. Eating low quality meat scraps, such as hamburger and highly processed meats, is demonstrably worse. Beans are a high quality source of protein, but not complete. However, combined with the protein found in grains, together they provide complete protein. Cultures all around the world have figured out how to get complete protein with available products.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Funny)
Also, the phrase "corporate sponsored corruption" has 2 too many words.
Re:good (Score:3, Funny)
You think you have it bad --- my doctor told me I had to stop posting comments on Slashdot!