Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space The Almighty Buck Science

Allen Telescope Array Shut Down 98

SETIGuy writes "The Allen Telescope Array has been put into hibernation due to lack of funds to continue operations. Most of the technical staff have been laid off or moved to other projects. It's too early to call it closed, but the hibernation state can only last for 6 months or so before a full shutdown is necessary. Coming back from a full shutdown would be expensive. It's unfortunate that the telescope never received the funding to build the 350 dish antennas that would make it a world class instrument. In its current 42-antenna state, it is not a significant enough improvement over other telescopes to attract enough funding to keep operating."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Allen Telescope Array Shut Down

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by SETIGuy ( 33768 ) on Monday April 25, 2011 @04:39PM (#35934302) Homepage
    It's inside knowledge. I don't think it's published anywhere. My understanding is they are keeping the receivers cold and power to some systems on to preserve them. That costs some real money, and that determines how long they can stay in that state. The trade off is that you can return to operation from hibernation state fairly quickly and cheaply. Once they go to full shutdown, they'll be disassembling the telescopes and bringing critical components inside. Coming back from that state would be very expensive.
  • by ethanms ( 319039 ) on Monday April 25, 2011 @04:50PM (#35934460)

    What is to skeptical about when it comes to SETI? I mean, do you doubt the existence of ET intelligence? The current programs ability to find them? Or do you question the current desire of some to find them?

    Now... if you want to doubt the current programs that's one thing... looking simply at radio waves is a narrow focus based on what we currently believe to be the best way to transmit information in our particular place. In 200 years we might look at the concept of radio transmission in the same way that today we look at the concept of using drums or smoke signals for communication... slow data rate, limited range, etc...

    But each time you look up at that sky realize that some of those dots are not actually suns... they are entire GALAXIES of suns. With millions of potential star systems why is it so difficult to believe that some of them might contain a civilization that is at a point which is equal to or far greater then our current current state of technology and may in fact be transmitting something we can "hear"? ...and if it's because "we're too far to bother", imagine if people had said that back in the days of sailing ships and horses... the desire to travel great distances in the shortest possible time has pushed for some amazing discoveries.

  • by SETIGuy ( 33768 ) on Monday April 25, 2011 @05:22PM (#35934858) Homepage
    Do you watch TV? Go to movies? Play video games? Listen to music? Why do you spend your money in such an irresponsible, unethical and morally questionable manner when we haven't eradicated certain issues that plague humanity such as poverty, illiteracy, poor or no education, using non-renewable as well as environmentally disruptive and destructive fuels, etc. You have no business wasting money on entertainment until we've done so.
  • Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by petermgreen ( 876956 ) <plugwash@nOSpam.p10link.net> on Monday April 25, 2011 @05:23PM (#35934866) Homepage

    One thing you learn from talking to people who work with radio astronomy is that "low noise" means different things to different people. Telecoms guys are usually satisfied with the results they can get from room temperature amplifiers. Radio astronomers are not, they run their amplifiers at liquid nitrogen or sometimes even liquid helium temperatures.

    This leaves a problem if they want to shut down, if they keep the cooling systems turned on then the cooling systems keep costing money to run and maintain. If they turn the cooling systems off then they risk damage from the warm up and the following cool down.

    I suspect 6 months is how long they can afford to keep the cooling etc running before they have to give up and let the system warm up

  • Well, that figures (Score:3, Insightful)

    by cdrguru ( 88047 ) on Monday April 25, 2011 @06:23PM (#35935572) Homepage

    VLA is being shut down soon, I think sometime in 2012 . It is perhaps going to be replaced by an array in Chile.

    Aricebo is being shut down as well.

    Sort of makes sense that we wouldn't build a real replacement in the US an even if we did, it would get shut down as well.

    Frankly, nobody is all that interested. There are much more interesting things to spend money on than science, things that people watching American Idol want to hear about. The few people that might be interested in science, well, they are just nerds anyway and don't count.

    Science just isn't all that popular.

Kleeneness is next to Godelness.

Working...