Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Space Science

Supermassive Black Holes Not So Big After All 153

Posted by CmdrTaco
from the puck-will-be-disappointed dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Supermassive black holes are between 2 and 10 times less massive than previously thought, according to new calculations published by German astrophysicists (abstract)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Supermassive Black Holes Not So Big After All

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Math? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 17, 2011 @10:51AM (#35232626)

    Personally, I'm also bothered when I hear "5 times more". Is it 6 times as much or 5 times as much?

  • Re:Math? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by mangu (126918) on Thursday February 17, 2011 @11:19AM (#35233034)

    The translation from "two times less massive" to "less massive by a factor of two" is pretty straightforward and easily understood...

    The real problem happens in the opposite direction. A star that's 200% as massive as the sun is smaller than one that's 150% more massive than the sun, but many people will give the wrong answer if asked.

"Kill the Wabbit, Kill the Wabbit, Kill the Wabbit!" -- Looney Tunes, "What's Opera Doc?" (1957, Chuck Jones)

Working...