Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Supermassive Black Holes Not So Big After All

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Math? (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 17, 2011 @11:50AM (#35232588)

    The pattern "x as massive" isn't the same as the pattern "x times less massive". You understand the first pattern. Now you need to learn the second pattern.

  • Re:Math? (Score:4, Informative)

    by Mr_Huber (160160) on Thursday February 17, 2011 @12:26PM (#35233132) Homepage

    It's also a difficulty with language. In physics, mass and weight are two separate concepts. We have comparison words for weight: heavier and lighter. But we do not necessarily have the same comparison words for mass. So we're stuck with the English default construct of more massive and less massive. Sure, we could use lighter in this context and hope everyone understands we really are discussing the concept of mass, not gravitational attractive force to the local big rock, but most physicists dislike that imprecision.

1 Mole = 25 Cagey Bees