Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Canada Government Science

Plastic Chemical BPA Declared Toxic In Canada 168

Julie188 writes "The Canadian government has formally declared bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical widely used to create clear, hard plastics, as well as food can liners, to be a toxic substance. Does this mean that you'll be tackled by the Canadian Mounties if you stroll around with some bottled water? Not exactly. Being a toxic chemical doesn't mean you can't get a little love. The government will at first try and set limits on how much BPA can be released into the air or water by factories that use the compound."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Plastic Chemical BPA Declared Toxic In Canada

Comments Filter:
  • by janvo ( 639733 ) on Saturday October 16, 2010 @08:35PM (#33920994) Journal
    This is definitely a step in the right direction. BPA is a risk to the entire population and it's use is very widespread. It disrupts our hormonal system and has now been linked to different types of breast cancer, heart disease and endocrine disorders. It also affects our reproductive systems. People really need to be aware that the use of plastics containing BPA is harmful and that use of this substance is currently ubiquitous throughout the world.
  • by FooAtWFU ( 699187 ) on Saturday October 16, 2010 @08:40PM (#33921016) Homepage
    I had gathered that asbestos is perfectly safe and fine as long as it stays out of your lungs; it's a physical contaminant, not a chemical one. (Am I wrong?) BPA contamination has the potential to be much more insidious.
  • by pz ( 113803 ) on Saturday October 16, 2010 @08:45PM (#33921050) Journal

    I hope Brita comes out with a glass pitcher...

    I'm pretty certain they'll come out with a BPA-free plastic version instead, since that's all the rage in bottles and food containers for infants.

    Personally, I'd be happy to have a world free of BPA. Unfortunately, that's going to be very difficult as it's found in many common items. For some, there are plastics that are good alternatives, but others, it will be some time before alternates can be found. In particular, epoxy binders used wood-based sheet goods production (particle board, chip board, flooring, etc.) are bad and are going to be around for a long time since there is so much of it installed.

    My family and I have stopped eating anything that comes in a can. Not only are cans typically lined with BPA-bearing plastics, but the contents are in intimate contact for a very long time. Avoiding canned foods has been pretty easy with one exception: canned tomatoes. If anyone has a good solution for those, I'd love to hear it.

  • by Wilson of Waste ( 1909510 ) on Saturday October 16, 2010 @09:28PM (#33921190)
    It has been known and banned in many other parts of the world. I don't even think the USA has done anything about it though. If you avoid number 3 plastics you have no BPA worries. That means number 1, 2, 4, 5, and six are BPA free. Just thought everyone would like to know
  • by canajin56 ( 660655 ) on Saturday October 16, 2010 @09:31PM (#33921208)
    And remember that most cans are lined with BPA containing plastic.
  • by Wilson of Waste ( 1909510 ) on Saturday October 16, 2010 @09:37PM (#33921244)
    That is true, I also forgot to mention that number 7 plastics may or may not contain BPA as well... As for medical grade plastics I am not sure..
  • by adonoman ( 624929 ) on Saturday October 16, 2010 @09:48PM (#33921294)
    You'd have have a bigger reduction of BPA intake by making sure you wash your hand every time you handle a thermal printed receipt. [sciencenews.org]
  • by fnj ( 64210 ) on Saturday October 16, 2010 @09:58PM (#33921338)

    Not exactly. Asbestos particles, when inhaled chronically, lead to mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is not lung cancer; it is a cancer of the pleura which cover the lungs. Asbestos particles, because of their form and other characteristics are especially capable of piercing the alveoli and reaching the pleura. Asbestos particles are only 3,000-20,000 nm long, and only 10 nm in diameter (a human hair is 17,000-180,000 nm in diameter; a red blood cell is 8,000 nm in diameter). Only rarely does exposure to any other substance lead to mesothelioma. Smoking, and exposure to other types of particulates, preponderantly leads to forms of lung cancer rather than mesothelioma.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 16, 2010 @11:31PM (#33921688)

    Not all.

    Some, notably from Appleton Papers, contains BP-S, another form of Bisphenol without the complications.

  • by IICV ( 652597 ) on Sunday October 17, 2010 @01:50PM (#33925000)

    But you touch it, and then eat with your hands without washing them because hey it's just a receipt. If the concentration is high enough, this can matter.

A motion to adjourn is always in order.

Working...