How To Deflect an Asteroid With Today's Technology 264
Matt_dk writes "Apollo 9 astronaut Rusty Schweickart is among an international group of people championing the need for the human race to prepare for what will certainly happen one day: an asteroid threat to Earth. Schweickart said the technology is available today to send a mission to an asteroid in an attempt to move it, or change its orbit so that an asteroid that threatens to hit Earth will pass by harmlessly. But what would such a mission entail?"
Talking about the apocalypse... (Score:4, Informative)
This of course means that when the world does end it isn't our fault- it's the fault of the people from the future failing to post-predict the apocalypse and make a time machine to stop it.
Re:tough choice (Score:3, Informative)
What if we only have the ability to divert it a little bit, if and when that comes? Then we only control WHERE it hits, not WHETHER it hits. So how do we choose, I wonder?
If the asteroid is big enough, it won't really matter where it hits. Anywhere on the planet will be a global disaster.
Re:tough choice (Score:3, Informative)
Gorath - 1962 (Score:3, Informative)
You don't move the asteroid... you move the Earth! With lots of giant hydrogen powered rocket tubes at the South Pole!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf2lvRStVdg [youtube.com]
Re:It all depends on detection... (Score:3, Informative)
Depends on what you call small.
There's a mailing list, Minor Planet Mailing List [yahoo.com], where amateur and professional asteroid hunters congregate and their equipment covers the gamut from 8" up meters wide scopes.
Regardless of scope size, they are all limited by the fact that it's hard to look towards the sun to spot asteroids whose orbits are primarily sunward of us. A well shaded scope parked at a Lagrange point could go a long ways towards addressing that threat.
Re:It all depends on detection... (Score:2, Informative)
ETA: 2 days (Score:4, Informative)
Early detection must be improved... that some of the asteroids that we know could take 15 years to get here and so give us enough time to prepare don't mean that some unknown or even known ones (if you want, because somehow changed its orbit) could be in its way here and detected when is already too late.
Re:It all depends on detection... (Score:1, Informative)
NASA's Deep Impact mission worked, and you'd be pretty hard pressed to say that the impactor portion isn't a dummy slug representing what would be potentially be a nuclear warhead. The dimensions and masses are thisclose when comparing its data to publicly known data representing nukes and their guidance packages available from the U.S. stockpile.
In other words, the Delta II or comparable rocket should be capable of getting the job done.