Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Cell Phones Powered By Conversations

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Infinite power (Score:3, Informative)

    by $RANDOMLUSER (804576) on Tuesday September 14, 2010 @08:30PM (#33582058)
    Congress could power the whole country.
  • Bogus (Score:5, Informative)

    by dtmos (447842) * on Tuesday September 14, 2010 @09:13PM (#33582182)

    This is a bogus story that wanders around every now and then. Cell phones require hundreds of milliwatts of transmit power, an amount of power far beyond what the human voice can achieve -- even at 100% conversion efficiency.

  • It already does (Score:3, Informative)

    by wisnoskij (1206448) on Tuesday September 14, 2010 @09:24PM (#33582234) Homepage

    The phone already taps the energy of sound, if their was no energy in the sound then the microphone would not be able to pick up the sound waves and send the information on.

    But even assuming that they can get the device to convert the power to small enough it does not matter, you would need a wide receiver, as the energy dissipates in all directions at a squared rate.
    and I would think that even if you converted all the power it would still not even be close to enough.
    think about it, you are basically saying the energy taken from a person speaking normally could be used for the same voice to be heard miles away, does not sound like it follows the laws of conservation of energy unless you think that it will be operating at 100% efficiency.

  • Re:Traffic solution? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Lotana (842533) on Tuesday September 14, 2010 @09:58PM (#33582376)

    ...and remember that things powered by the car driving over a power capturing device is stealing gas from your tank indirectly.

    Stealing? Are you trying to troll by attempting to get people outraged that the device powers from the sound generated due to inefficiency of your vehicle?

    It is technically true, the energy of the sound does comes from your fuel tank. But remember that your car would still be expanding just as much energy on generating the noise whether or not there is any sound-gathering device around. Driving on the country road in the middle of nowhere will not increase your fuel efficiency.

    Really the term "stealing" is completely invalid in this case. Now if the headline was about some fancy road surface that converted traction into energy then you would be absolutely correct, because it would adversely affect the performance of your vehicle, thus increasing its energy expenditure, thus stealing from your fuel tank.

  • Re:Bogus (Score:5, Informative)

    by blueg3 (192743) on Tuesday September 14, 2010 @10:29PM (#33582514)

    The human voice produces a hell of a lot more power than a cellphone, you can disagree if you want

    Well, a human shouting is about 1 mW. A cell phone's antenna outputs in the ballpark of 250 mW.

    Some quick back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that if the entire area of a cell phone could pick up sound energy, the ambient sound level was at the pain threshold of 120 dB (1 W/m^w), and it achieved 100% energy conversion, this would generate about 15 mW. For just the 250 mW antenna, this means about 90 minutes of talk time per 24 hours exposure.

    120 dB is very loud, and a far cry from how much sound a phone would normally be exposed to. Note that sound is measured on a logarithmic scale. If the phone was constantly exposed to 60 dB of sound, then it'd only generate 15 nanowatts.

  • From the Article (Score:3, Informative)

    by PiAndWhippedCream (1566727) on Tuesday September 14, 2010 @10:55PM (#33582674)

    The sound waves produced a mild electrical current of about 50 millivolts. The average cell phone requires a few volts to operate, several times the power this technology can currently produce.

    Wrong, so very wrong. Millivolts is not a unit of current, and volts is no unit of power. Nor is power current. I've seen journalists not understanding electrical units before, but never have I seen something quite so wrong as this.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 14, 2010 @11:10PM (#33582746)

    Hmm.. Sounds a lot like the "Sound-powered Telephone" that's been in use with the US Navy (and probably many other navys) for over 6 decades....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound-powered_telephone

  • Re:Bogus (Score:3, Informative)

    by blueg3 (192743) on Wednesday September 15, 2010 @10:11AM (#33586512)

    Not really. All of my estimates are very high (conversion of 100%, entire phone is covered in the sound-converting material, etc.), but the ambient noise level is the problem. In a crowded place like a restaurant, you're talking about maybe 60 dB of sound. An entire day's exposure to 60 dB of sound would get you less than 1 microwatt-hour. That's a uselessly tiny fraction of a battery's storage.

How many QA engineers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? 3: 1 to screw it in and 2 to say "I told you so" when it doesn't work.

Working...