Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine Biotech

Gene Mutation Caused 2009 H1N1 Virus Spread 158

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers have found that a gene mutation was the reason behind the increased virulence of the 2009 H1N1 swine flu virus which resulted in a pandemic across the world. 'The H1N1 virus, Kawaoka explains, is really a combination of four different avian and swine flu viruses that have emerged over the past 90 years, and even includes genetic residue of the 1918 pandemic virus, an influenza that killed as many as 20 million people.' The University of Wisconsin-Madison's School of Veterinary Medicine researchers identified the relocation of a specific amino acid in the gene matrix that enabled the virus to hijack host cells, a feat that triggered the recent pandemic." The World Health Organization's director general said H1N1 is likely to lose its status as a pandemic very soon.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gene Mutation Caused 2009 H1N1 Virus Spread

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Pandemic? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Skidborg ( 1585365 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:14PM (#33196992)
    As was Mad Cow, Hoof and Mouth, Y2K, Terrorists, Avian Flu, and a half dozen other incidents in the past couple decades.
  • by sjames ( 1099 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:19PM (#33197074) Homepage Journal

    It WAS and IS unjustified media fear mongering. They had everyone expecting another Spanish flu at least or perhaps a great plague level event. They had people convinced that not getting vaccinated was as good as a death sentence. Governments were stockpiling massive quantities of flu remedies.

    Nobody denied that the flu existed and that it was a mutation was a given. The particular mutation involved is interesting.

    Note the distinct lack of mass graves, cities shut down or evacuated, auditoriums converted to medical wards, etc. etc. etc. Note how the "pandemic" went into decline even before the flu shots had a chance to become effective. Note how the overall mortality rate was a bit less than that of the typical seasonal flu.

    In other words.....YAWN!

  • Re:Still here? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by icannotthinkofaname ( 1480543 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:28PM (#33197208) Journal

    I was thinking the same thing.

    I didn't get either vaccine last year (that is, neither H1N1 nor the regular one), and I haven't caught either flu. Basic sanitary practices like washing my hands when I use the bathroom and refusing to share drinks seem to work in today's world.

  • by hondo77 ( 324058 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:37PM (#33197330) Homepage
    And if all the people in New Orleans had been bussed out before Katrina hit, it would have been a yawner, too. Then people would have complained that the expensive evacuation wasn't worth the money and that it was all just media hype.
  • Re:Still here? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by hondo77 ( 324058 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:39PM (#33197378) Homepage
    It's also possible that a number of people around you were vaccinated, which would have decreased your risk of exposure. Just a thought.
  • by Vornzog ( 409419 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:50PM (#33197536)

    Quite a few less deaths than seasonal flu, seems to be the consensus. It was a pandemic in that it spread world-wide, but not a very deadly one. In fact, WHO seriously debated not calling it a pandemic to prevent panic, but eventually called it anyway because it met the definition.

    This got a lot of press because it was a pandemic, and because it effected children instead of seniors. Didn't actually kill that many people, though.

  • Re:Still here? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by The Archon V2.0 ( 782634 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:54PM (#33197574)

    I was thinking the same thing.

    I didn't get either vaccine last year (that is, neither H1N1 nor the regular one), and I haven't caught either flu. Basic sanitary practices like washing my hands when I use the bathroom and refusing to share drinks seem to work in today's world.

    Well I got both vaccines and I didn't catch either one, so they must've worked.

    Thing is, I have as much proof I was exposed and protected by the vaccines as you have that you were exposed and protected by washing your hands. Which is to say, none. Preventative measures are invisible if they work and invisible if they're never tested, which makes anecdotes even less useful than normal.

    But I gotta say... washing hands just after using the bathroom? Maybe if you work from home, but I'd at least add before meals or even snacking to that list. (Edges away from semi-public keyboard used for work.)

  • Re:Still here? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Belial6 ( 794905 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:59PM (#33197652)
    That tactic will not work for a large portion of the population. The existence of our school system means that airborne diseases will pass through large portions of the population. Particularly in winter months, you are taking virtually all of the minor population and packing them into tight quarters for long periods of time. That is without even factoring in the fact that school kids are unlikely to take the basic sanitary practices that you do. Sometimes they are not even allowed to.

    So, your tactic might work for you, and if it does, I say keep it up, but unless you are prepared to take some drastic measures like shutting down the public school system, it won't work for most people. I don't get flue vaccines either. Mostly because at places I have worked, I have noticed a trend that the more people getting flue shots, the higher the rate of people with the flue. That and since I both telecommute and home school, it is really easy for me and my family to avoid people that are really sick.
  • by sjames ( 1099 ) on Monday August 09, 2010 @07:37PM (#33198042) Homepage Journal

    Nobody got "bussed out" though. The drugs sit on shelves (expiring rapidly).

    It's as if a tropical storm formed on the Atlantic as usual and we evacuated the entire southeast right away, continuing the evacuation even after the spotter planes told us it had broken up and become a light rain shower. A year later and we still haven't officially admitted there is no hurricane.

    Thanks to that, if a real killer flu happens that really could wipe out a third of the population, everyone will yawn and nobody will get an actually necessary vaccine.

  • Re:Not unexpected (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 09, 2010 @08:12PM (#33198390)

    The 2009 H1N1 must have mutated at a whole other level to be that resistant.

    Must have? I find it surprising that so many people believe this was a random event when the first reported case of the
    2009 N1H1 was about 80 miles from a research complex for Gilead Sciences (the company that developed Tamiflu) and one of
    the researchers looking at 2009 N1H1 stated it was almost identical to a flu virus they'd been working on at the lab.

    Production of 400 million capsules at around $12 each is a very big incentive to release a virus.

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...