Stem Cell Patent Halts Hospital's Collection 223
eldavojohn writes "It's a classic case that comes up when dealing with patents. A hospital's research on the donated brains of deceased children has been in limbo for three years because of a challenge from a patent holder. The double-edged sword of patents that spurred investment into the field will also cause chilling effects on research like the case of the Children's Hospital of Orange County. They've now been forced to shift the money from the lab to lawyers in order to deal with this ongoing patent dispute over a technique that was developed to extract stem cells at the Salk Institute. Unfortunately the Salk Institute failed to patent the technology, so a company named StemCells happily had it approved. The real disheartening news is that CHOC's Dr. Philip H. Schwartz — the doctor collecting the cells — was one of the original researchers who helped developed this technique at the Salk Institute. Now he can't even use the technique he helped create. Schwartz has since been instructed not to publicly discuss the case further. Research interests are clashing with commercial interests in a classic case that causes one to wonder if patents surrounding medical techniques like this stretch too far. As for the people that donated their dead child's brain to research, those valuable stem cell cultures have been kept in storage instead of being disseminated to research labs (which desperately need them) across the country."
Re:How patently stupid. (Score:1, Informative)
They can't patent it; it's called prior art.
Good luck getting patents to actually work how they're supposed to, though.
Re:Publish Owners Names (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.stemcellsinc.com/company/management.html [stemcellsinc.com]
http://www.stemcellsinc.com/company/executiveofficers.html [stemcellsinc.com]
http://www.stemcellsinc.com/company/scientificfounders.html [stemcellsinc.com]
Re:How patently stupid. (Score:5, Informative)
Didn't RTFA?
One of the doctors complaining is one of the doctors that invented the process.
here you go (Score:1, Informative)
Google Finance knows all:
http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ASTEM [google.com]
Scroll to the bottom and there is a list of Execs.
Martin McGlynn is CEO:
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=STEM.O&officerId=169142 [reuters.com]
"Mr. Martin M. McGlynn serves as President, Chief Executive Officer, Director of StemCells Inc. Mr. Martin McGlynn joined the company in January 2001, when he was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the company and of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Mr. McGlynn was elected to the Board of Directors in February 2001."
$1,324,380 per year is a pretty decent salary.
Re:here you go (Score:5, Informative)
'Tis good to be a patent troll
Why do we have patents on life-saving techniques? Can you imagine if there was a patent on washing your hands or stitching a wound?
Re:One can always hope (Score:3, Informative)
Even better, I found a youtube clip of it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOe_4mgmyyA [youtube.com]
Re:ah, thank goodness (Score:4, Informative)
Research exemption (Score:4, Informative)
He didn't assume it, he asked about it.
And may have been thinking about the 271(e)(1) exemption or "Hatch-Waxman exemption".
Re:The value of defensive patents. (Score:4, Informative)
So it seems that both inventions were made at the same time, independently. In that case, either party may file for and be awarded the patent in the US [wikipedia.org].
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Informative)
Re:ah, thank goodness (Score:2, Informative)
Well the Embryonic Stem-Cell debate (which isn't what this is about) is what there is debate about, because in order to get these stem-cells you need to terminate the fetus, which is a valid moral debate without thumping the bible, because the PEOPLE who wrote the bible never even considered about thinking things to that detail. Terms of Patents just because they are protecting their patient it doesn't mean they are a Patent Troll. A lot of this type of stuff we really need a good debate on it, without finger pointing. We are blurring lines that use to be black and white. I don't think it is really going to the dark ages but more to a point we need really figure out the implementations of these problems.
Re:prior art? (Score:4, Informative)
The word you're looking for is "afoul". Though you did conjure up an interesting image.
Re:Become part of the brain drain. (Score:3, Informative)
Whats wrong with India? Half the people I work with are from India, its a democratic country and developing at a breakneck pace; not as fast as China but democracy moves slower than communism with the advantage of more freedom.
What kind of crap have you been reading about the UAE? Not all UAE states have draconian laws for women. Dubai [wikipedia.org] has a western like culture and is very tolerant of westerners. Yes some of the UAE states are strict, but not all; and it is changing for the better.