Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Science

Element 114 Verified 142

Posted by kdawson
from the cento-do-deco-quaternium dept.
ExRex writes "A team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has observed the production of superheavy element 114, confirming the results of researchers at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia. Those researchers first reported producing element 114 in 1999. Such independent verification is important, particularly given the evidence of fabricated results for other superheavy elements. If you're a subscriber to Physical Review Letters, you can download the full article."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Element 114 Verified

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @01:48AM (#29819847)

    Why don't we see Plutonium or Neptunium in nature? Because despite there being "stable" isotopes with half-lives measured in millions of years, the age of the Earth is several orders of magnitude greater than that. Any isotope with a half-life less than about 30 million years would be completely decayed over the current age of the Earth (~4.5 billion years), even if it began as abundant as Iron (nearly 1/3 of Earth's mass) not a single atom would remain today.

    The isotopes in the "island of stability" would be far too short lived to exist on Earth from natural production.

  • by ndogg (158021) <the.rhorn@Nospam.gmail.com> on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @05:06AM (#29820731) Homepage Journal

    And that's why I want to be a mathematician. For the ladies!

    They love it when I integrate with them. And months after that, we'll derive!

    And years later, we'll try to figure out why nothing has changed.

Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it.

Working...