Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
NASA Space Science

Crew For Final Scheduled Space Shuttle Mission Selected 108

Toren Altair writes "NASA has assigned the crew for the last scheduled space shuttle mission, targeted to launch in September 2010. The flight to the International Space Station will carry a pressurized logistics module to the station. Veteran shuttle commander and retired Air Force Col. Steven W. Lindsey will command the eight-day mission, designated STS-133. Air Force Col. Eric A. Boe will serve as the pilot; it will be his second flight as a shuttle pilot. Mission Specialists are shuttle mission veteran Air Force Col. Benjamin Alvin Drew, Jr., and long-duration spaceflight veterans Michael R. Barratt, Army Col. Timothy L. Kopra and Nicole P. Stott." Reader Al points out other NASA news that the space agency's engineers have been testing a sleek new lunar rover that will be part of their eventual return to the moon. A video of the rover in action has been posted as well.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Crew For Final Scheduled Space Shuttle Mission Selected

Comments Filter:
  • by kestasjk ( 933987 ) * on Saturday September 19, 2009 @01:00PM (#29477125) Homepage
    It's called the Ares V, and it too is still under development
  • Re:Darn. (Score:4, Informative)

    by sopssa ( 1498795 ) * <sopssa@email.com> on Saturday September 19, 2009 @01:09PM (#29477193) Journal

    However it seems like theres lots of interest and activity in private space flights currently:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_spaceflight_companies [wikipedia.org]

    Interesting article about them [spaceref.com]

    Several other small private aerospace companies not competing for Ansari X Prize are also making news. According to Aviation Week, Bigelow Aerospace, who are developing inflatable space modules, plan to announce shortly the creation of yet another prize competition, this one for $50 million, called Americaâ(TM)s Space Prize that will go to whoever develops a spacecraft that will service their inflatable space modules.

    And yet another company, Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX), plan to launch their first partly reusable rocket Falcon 1 early next year. In developing their space program, SpaceX has created new technology, which they claim allows them to reduce the cost of launch four times lower than their nearest competitor and increase reliability.

    This along with Tickets On Sale In Sweden For Space Tourism, Starting In 2012 [slashdot.org].

  • by K. S. Kyosuke ( 729550 ) on Saturday September 19, 2009 @01:38PM (#29477379)
    Uhm, wasn't there a six-year window in US manned spaceflights after the Apollo-Soyuz mission in 1975? And the world did not end.
  • Re:Darn. (Score:5, Informative)

    by dryeo ( 100693 ) on Saturday September 19, 2009 @01:41PM (#29477407)

    Actually that is a Canadian robotic arm.

  • by dryeo ( 100693 ) on Saturday September 19, 2009 @01:46PM (#29477433)

    There was a long stretch between the end of Apollo and the first Shuttle where America didn't have the capability of getting an astronaut to orbit.

  • by DerekLyons ( 302214 ) <fairwater@@@gmail...com> on Saturday September 19, 2009 @03:13PM (#29477959) Homepage

    Of over 100 missions 2 disasters isn't too bad, it much better than Apollo and no-one brings up the failures of Apollo whenever it's mentioned like they do with the Shuttle.

    For that matter, other than the Apollo 1 fire and the Apollo 13 fire/explosion (and maybe the computer faults on 11) - most people aren't even aware of the multitude and magnitude of the failures experienced during Apollo.
     
    For example:

    • Apollo 13 - severe POGO vibration came within seconds of reaching a magnitude sufficient to destroy the launch vehicle, averted only because the vibration caused the center J2 engine on the S-II stage to fail and shutdown.
       
      Severe vibration were also encountered on 11 and 12 but never reached dangerous levels. A fix was available in time for 13's flight, but management elected not to delay the flight to retrofit the fix into the booster.
       
    • Apollo 14
      • Docking mechanism failure after Trans Lunar Injection. Contrary to mission rules, the flight controllers directed the crew to 'brute force' the docking risking severe damage to the CM and LM.
         
      • Loss of Landing Radar. In violation of mission rules, crew continued with landing.
    • Apollo 15 - During landing, one parachute failed to deploy.
       
    • Apollo 16 - While in lunar orbit, it was discovered that the primary wiring harness for the SM's main propulsion system was damaged and inoperable. Despite a mission rule requiring an immediate mission abort and return to Earth, management and controllers elected to continue with the mission.
       
    • Skylab IV (Carr, Pogue, Gibson) - leaking tanks in the SM nearly caused the mission to be cut short. Management elected instead to make preparation to use the standby rescue vehicle.
       
    • Apollo Soyuz Test Project - During landing, crew error resulting in filling the cockpit with toxic fumes from fuel being vented from the reaction control system. The crew managed to vent the spacecraft, postflight investigations show that gas levels just shy of lethal were reached in the cockpit.
  • by frieko ( 855745 ) on Saturday September 19, 2009 @03:23PM (#29478013)
    While I agree that the Shuttle gets a bad rap on safety, the fact that in 32 manned flights, Apollo, Mercury and Gemini lost just one crew and zero vehicles is pretty remarkable.

    Don't worry, I'm sure in time the shuttle will be remembered as a white elephant rather than a death trap ;)
  • by sconeu ( 64226 ) on Saturday September 19, 2009 @10:34PM (#29480509) Homepage Journal

    Gemini 8 had the crew closer to death than did Apollo 13.

egrep -n '^[a-z].*\(' $ | sort -t':' +2.0

Working...