Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Moon Science

Shadowed Lunar Craters May Be Coldest Spot In the Solar System 108

sciencehabit writes "Science reports: 'What's the coldest spot in the solar system? For now, that distinction belongs to permanently shadowed craters near the moon's south pole, according to the first results from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft announced today at a NASA press conference. Another instrument has returned hints of water ice in some of these cold spots, ... but it also showed signs of water ice in impossibly hot places, too.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Shadowed Lunar Craters May Be Coldest Spot In the Solar System

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Really? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MartinSchou ( 1360093 ) on Friday September 18, 2009 @09:20PM (#29473401)

    Well, there could be some other reasons for wanting to know.

    If you build a moon base, you could use these spots for some interesting stuff. Like infra-red observatories, which I think need to have a cold sensor to increase sensitivity.

    Additionally 33 Kelvin is low enough that you can use at least one iron based superconductor [wikipedia.org] for energy storage. That way you can have huge arrays of solar panels or similar, and just dump surplus energy into a superconducting magnetic energy storage [wikipedia.org].

    The superconductors would also give you essentially free cooling for particle accelerators, but I've no idea how large those craters are, nor if that'd even be useful.

  • Re:Really? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by quercus.aeternam ( 1174283 ) on Friday September 18, 2009 @09:55PM (#29473539) Homepage

    A look at the energy storage option was very interesting - One side effect is the generation of an extremely large magnetic field:

    "The biggest concern with SMES, beyond possible accidents such as a break in the containment of liquid nitrogen, is the very large magnetic fields that would be created by a commercial installation, which would dwarf the magnetic field of the Earth."

    If this is the case, even a small installation could be extremely good from a health standpoint, especially in the context of colonization. Though they would still be without the protective effects of the atmosphere, they would probably be protected from a significant amount of radiation.

  • by argent ( 18001 ) <peter@slashdot.2 ... m ['.ta' in gap]> on Friday September 18, 2009 @10:28PM (#29473669) Homepage Journal

    Back when we though Mercury was tidally locked to the Sun (instead of being tidally locked to the Sun and Venus) Larry Niven wrote a short story "The Coldest Place", in which the backside of Mercury, always facing away from the Sun, was the coldest place in the solar system.

    Good guess, Larry. Not quite right, but ... good going.

  • Re:Really? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cratermoon ( 765155 ) on Saturday September 19, 2009 @02:37AM (#29474679) Homepage

    125 degrees C is indeed above the boiling point of water at 1 atm. However, 125C is NOT 75 degrees F. More like 257F.

    We should all be glad that 75F is not above the boiling point of water, otherwise our bodies would turn to puffs of steam.

  • Re:obligatory #37 (Score:3, Interesting)

    by petrus4 ( 213815 ) on Saturday September 19, 2009 @02:43AM (#29474707) Homepage Journal

    Uranus needs to be renamed back to Herschel, after the guy who discovered it. Stupid jokes come up every time the planet is mentioned.

  • Oort Cloud? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by bryan1945 ( 301828 ) on Saturday September 19, 2009 @06:18AM (#29475403) Journal

    Does the Oort cloud count as part of the solar system, or is it beyond the heliosphere? Either way, it's gotta be a tad chilly out there.

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...