Panel Recommends Space Science, Not Stunts 304
wisebabo writes "A panel reporting to President Obama is recommending that we skip landing on the Moon and Mars and instead consider progressively deeper space voyages (first to the L1 Earth-Moon point, then perhaps the L2 Earth-Sun point, then a Mars flyby/orbit or asteroid visits). While in Mars orbit, the astronauts could send robotic probes to land on the surface, which could be much more effective than current rovers without the 10-minute time lag to Earth. I, for one, whole-heartedly agree that this approach would lead to 'the most steady cadence of steady improvement,' and keep us from inconsistent achievements in space (like not leaving Earth orbit for 40 years). Some would say that this approach would be lacking in the photo-ops necessary to maintain interest in the space program (no footprints on Martian soil) but I think there would be plenty of cool vistas — perhaps a rendezvous with a comet, or even orbiting one of the moons of Jupiter, assuming they figure out radiation shielding — to keep the taxpayer dollars flowing. The science return would be much greater because it would hopefully utilize both man and machine at their best; robots on one-way trips down into a gravity well while the humans provide the intuition and flexibility from orbit."
why not just... (Score:2, Funny)
oh wait...
Re:Nice idea, but... (Score:5, Funny)
I can assure you it does.
Re:Public Attention (Score:0, Funny)
>>> there's no big Russian menace for the public to cry out, "We must beat them!"
If only Osama Bin Laden was planning a Mars mission !
Re:Nice idea, but... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Public Attention (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Nice idea, but... (Score:2, Funny)