Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Science Hardware Technology

First Electronic Quantum Processor Created 205

Posted by ScuttleMonkey
from the baby-steps dept.
ScienceDaily is reporting that the first rudimentary solid-state quantum processor has been created by a team led by Yale University researchers. "Working with a group of theoretical physicists led by Steven Girvin, the Eugene Higgins Professor of Physics & Applied Physics, the team manufactured two artificial atoms, or qubits ('quantum bits'). While each qubit is actually made up of a billion aluminum atoms, it acts like a single atom that can occupy two different energy states. These states are akin to the '1' and '0' or 'on' and 'off' states of regular bits employed by conventional computers. Because of the counterintuitive laws of quantum mechanics, however, scientists can effectively place qubits in a 'superposition' of multiple states at the same time, allowing for greater information storage and processing power."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

First Electronic Quantum Processor Created

Comments Filter:
  • Lab Site & Papers (Score:5, Informative)

    by eldavojohn (898314) * <my/.username@@@gmail.com> on Monday June 29 2009, @01:06PM (#28515989) Journal
    You can find the lab site here [yale.edu] with several papers freely available in pre-publication form on arxiv [yale.edu] from the researchers. I'm trying to find the "basic algorithms" the article alludes to that these rudimentary processors can perform. I thought only a handful were applicable (Shor's algorithm) to quantum computing. Anyone know?
  • Simulating? (Score:3, Informative)

    by immakiku (777365) on Monday June 29 2009, @01:06PM (#28516001)

    While each qubit is actually made up of a billion aluminum atoms, it acts like a single atom that can occupy two different energy states.

    Does this sound like they're using real atoms to simulate qubits? Perhaps I'm misinterpretting, but it looks like it's still going to take an exponential amount of resources to "make" each additional qubit.

  • by GameGod0 (680382) on Monday June 29 2009, @01:11PM (#28516085)
    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/nature08121.pdf [nature.com]

    (For those with access to Nature through school or work...)
  • by clang_jangle (975789) on Monday June 29 2009, @01:18PM (#28516175) Journal
    Not quite yet. FTFA:

    Next, the team will work to increase the amount of time the qubits maintain their quantum states so they can run more complex algorithms. They will also work to connect more qubits to the quantum bus. The processing power increases exponentially with each qubit added, Schoelkopf said, so the potential for more advanced quantum computing is enormous. But he cautions it will still be some time before quantum computers are being used to solve complex problems. "We're still far away from building a practical quantum computer, but this is a major step forward."

  • Re:Problem Solved (Score:4, Informative)

    by ByOhTek (1181381) on Monday June 29 2009, @01:29PM (#28516331) Journal

    That has been long since solved with evolutionary genetics.

    The egg.

    What produced it just happened not to be a chicken. Something close, but not quite.

  • by oodaloop (1229816) on Monday June 29 2009, @01:38PM (#28516469)
    Obligatory slashdot answer on any topic regarding quantum mechanics: Yes and No.
  • by bostongraf (1216362) on Monday June 29 2009, @01:38PM (#28516483)

    they did not manufacture "two artificial atoms, or qubits". They manufactured two clusters of atoms that acted as qubits.

    A qubit [wikipedia.org] is not actually a quantum particle. It is a unit of quantum information. Now, do you consider the qubit to be the system or the state?

  • Re:Most Excellent (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 29 2009, @02:05PM (#28516911)

    Parent is correct (assuming he was making a Bill and Ted reference).
    It would be a time travelling "Police Box" if he'd botched a Doctor Who reference.

  • Re:Simulating? (Score:4, Informative)

    by dlenmn (145080) on Monday June 29 2009, @02:11PM (#28517003) Homepage
    There's no simulation -- the large group of atoms forms one qubit. That's why this is interesting. Normally, only very small things (like one atom) exhibit quantum behavior. This system is large for something able to exhibit quantum behavior. All the parts effectively join together to act like one quantum system.
  • by smallfries (601545) on Monday June 29 2009, @02:30PM (#28517319) Homepage

    Yes the first. The Dwave guys aren't building quantum computers. Their system lacks entanglement between the qubits, which is essential to running quantum algorithms. They have also been less than forthcoming about the coherence in their system.

  • Re:Problem Solved (Score:4, Informative)

    by Loko Draucarn (398556) on Monday June 29 2009, @02:40PM (#28517483)

    No, no, you've got it backwards.

    A non-chicken laid a chicken egg (i.e. the egg's genes were those of a chicken), from which hatched a chicken.

  • by reverseengineer (580922) on Monday June 29 2009, @03:06PM (#28517851)
    The ScienceDaily article and the /. summary seem to be confused on the experimental setup. From the Nature article, "[e]ach qubit has a split Josephson junction...." The Josephson effect is an effect where two superconductors are separated by a very thin insulating layer. A "supercurrent" composed of paired correlated electrons (Cooper pairs) can tunnel across this barrier under certain circumstances. Cooper pairs act as bosons, just as atoms do in Bose-Einstein condensates, so they have long been a focus of research for quantum computing. In this experiment, the device was a "180nm Nb film was d.c.-magnetron sputtered on the epipolished surface of an R-plane corundum wafer," meaning that the superconductor they used was niobium, and the insulator was aluminum oxide, aka corundum. They built it out of these [wikipedia.org], in other words.

    They go on to mention that the apparatus was cooled to 13 millikelvin using a helium dilution refrigerator. Now, niobium is superconductive to about 9 kelvin in the pure state (and about 23 kelvin in some alloys), so I would assume the extra effort to make it that cold has more to do with preserving the delicate electronic state of the qubits than with merely chilling the superconductors.

"I'm not stupid, I'm not expendable, and I'M NOT GOING!"

Working...