Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Image

Cows That Burp Less Methane to Be Bred 366

Canadian scientists are breeding a type of cow that burps less, in an attempt to reduce greenhouse gases. Cows are responsible for almost 75% of total methane emissions, mostly coming from burps. Stephen Moore, professor of agricultural, food and nutritional science at the University of Alberta, hopes the refined bovines will produce 25 per cent less methane. Nancy Hirshberg, spokesman for Stonyfield Farm says, "If every US dairy farmer reduced emissions by 12 per cent it would be equal to about half a million cars being taken off the road."

*

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Cows That Burp Less Methane to Be Bred

Comments Filter:
  • by frankxcid ( 884419 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2009 @01:35PM (#28455251)
    I so sick of these type of meaningless statistics that just serve to give good feelings without doing anything useful. They also serve to make things worse when some fool law maker reads this and creates a tax for those farmers who don't reduce their output. The law maker can claim he took half a million cars off the road and meat just costs more while methane will stay the same or increase.
  • Use it (Score:2, Interesting)

    by edivad ( 1186799 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2009 @01:39PM (#28455317)
    Just use the darn methane do power your farm. Problem solved!
  • Meat Vats (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Sponge Bath ( 413667 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2009 @01:45PM (#28455419)

    Get rid of most of the cow/pig/chicken altogether. Use special meat vats that grow cloned tissue in a special nutrient. No more digestion means no more burps and farts. Place the meat factories in all cities to save on transport. In the long term you could even add infrastructure to pipe liquified meat product directly to restaurants and homes where it could be formed and flavored.

    Welcome to the world of the future!

  • by mzs ( 595629 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2009 @01:55PM (#28455623)

    The amount of carbon produced by the cow in its lifetime plus decomposition after death is essentially the same as if the cow had never lived and all the corn and soy it would have eaten simply decomposed. The problem is that a cow produces not just carbon in one form, it tends to produce methane (the burps referred to) and methane has a much larger impact in global warming than CO2. The reason that the cows produce large amounts of methane is because the bacteria in their rumen (first stomach) is not right for the diets of mostly corn and soy that they are typically fed and this produces the methane burps. (Incidentally that is why there is relatively little methane in cow farts, almost all of the methane is produced in the rumen.)

    So one option is to feed cows mostly grass, that is not sustainable in the large industrial scale used. Another option would be to genetically engineer bacteria that produces less methane and introduce it to the cow rumen. That actually makes more sense than engineering cows with a rumen more like a stomach. Another far fetched option would be to capture the methane, then sequester or burn it outright (the green house gases then are much less harmful).

    If you have ever been near an industrial cattle or dairy farm, the stench is unimaginable. In a large cattle farm you can see the methane pockets causing the horizon to wiggle.

  • Re:Easy alternative (Score:5, Interesting)

    by panthroman ( 1415081 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2009 @02:00PM (#28455755) Homepage

    Seriously. Obviously 12% fewer cattle is the methane equivalent of "half a million cars off the road," according to their PR lady. So if everyone ate 12% less beef/dairy...

    If you eat beef twice a week, then a 12% reduction is skipping one beef meal a month. One of the biggest 'vegetarian movement' mistakes was to paint vegetarianism as a black & white issue. If one meal a month can make this kind of environmental difference, vegetarians might do more for their cause if they applauded and promoted meat in moderation.

  • Cow-goroos? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by wowbagger ( 69688 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2009 @02:19PM (#28456065) Homepage Journal

    Kangaroos have a different microbe in their gut that captures the methane and makes that energy available to the 'roo. There had been talk of trying to get this microbe into cattle, which would not only reduce the methane output from the cattle but would also make more food energy available to the cow. What ever happened to that?

  • Re:Easy alternative (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Rei ( 128717 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2009 @03:16PM (#28456897) Homepage

    Name one thing that I wrote that is incorrect. The American Heart Association says it puts you at risk for heart disease. The American Medical Association has repeatedly gone on the attack against it. So has the American Dietetic Association. And Snopes categorizes the role of Atkin's heart problems in his death as "undetermined", citing the arguments of both sides, and links to his death certificate on The Smoking Gun. What "5 minutes on Google" are you looking at?

  • Re:Easy alternative (Score:3, Interesting)

    by hot soldering iron ( 800102 ) on Wednesday June 24, 2009 @03:54PM (#28457479)

    I heard about this a "few" years ago... Actually, the reduced methane production is sought after because it's energy wasted, instead of being converted into meat. My uncle has developed a small herd over the last 50 years that puts on 6lbs a day until they reach maturity (the average weight in his herd is over 1200 lbs). A friend of mine said they looked like giant sausages with legs. Selective breeding gave them rapid growth, strength, and a strong immune system (less expensive medications/vaccines). Less flatulence was just a nice side-effect! : )

Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.

Working...