Space Station Crew Drinks Recycled Urine 349
An anonymous reader writes "After the astronauts on the International Space Station finished up their communications with Space Shuttle Atlantis yesterday, the crew on the Space Station did something that no other astronaut has ever done before — drank recycled urine and sweat. The previous shuttle crew that recently returned to Earth brought back samples of the recycled water to make sure it was safe to drink, and all tests came back fine. So on Wednesday, the crew took their recycled urine and said 'cheers' together and toasted the researches and scientists that made the Urine Recycler possible. After drinking the water, they said the taste was great! They also said the water came with labels on it that said 'drink this when real water is over 200 miles away.'"
Re:Nonsense. (Score:5, Informative)
For those who read/watched Dune, the fremins just do in minutes with a machine what nature dose for us in months with sunlight.
'waterhasnotaste' tag (Score:2, Informative)
All water that isn't pure hydrogen and oxygen also has a flavor derived from the levels of various trace minerals and additives in it. Just because you can't taste something doesn't mean I can't!
Re:Nonsense. (Score:5, Informative)
> Everyone drinks recycled urine and sweat every day.
While a good point, this may not be quite as true in the case of the astronauts aboard ISS.
A large portion of the water delivered to ISS comes from the Space Shuttle as it combusts liquid hydrogen to power itself while docked. Depending on the source of the liquid hydrogen and oxygen fuel (i.e. Is it generated from electrolysis of water? Condensed directly from the atmosphere? etc), it's possible a significant portion of their water supply has never been urine or sweat before.
And even if the liquid hydrogen and oxygen was water previously, do water molecules generated from hydrogen combustion really count as "recycled"?
-- CdM
Re:Nonsense. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:How does that make it not "real water"? (Score:3, Informative)
Um... POO comes to mind.
The way nature intended (Score:1, Informative)
Re:How does that make it not "real water"? (Score:5, Informative)
Coca-Cola is created from concentrate or syrup. This concentrate is shipped to bottlers who add their own sweetners and other additives, which causes local variations. Then it is combined with water from different sources, causing even more variations. Coca-Cola, even in a can or bottle, tastes differently all over the place.
Then add to that the abomination that is fountain-based Coca-Cola, which is syrup mixed with carbonated tap water. This means that the Coca-Cola from your local city-water-fed McDonald's tastes differently from the Coca-Cola served in the well-water-fed McDonald's just out of town.
You should count yourself lucky if you've ever had two servings of Coca-Cola that tasted the same.
</rant type="pet peeve">
Re:its worse than that (Score:4, Informative)
Uhm, actually you are wrong, some fish (poecilidae like guppys or swordtails) do fuck.
Re:Nonsense. (Score:5, Informative)
There's an interesting piece on the rise of cesarian section delivery [newyorker.com] written by New Yorker staff writer and active surgeon Atul Gawande, where he claims and shows evidence that c-section replaced forceps delivery because forceps delivery required experience, skill, and physical dexterity, while c-section could be taught by rote, essentially. His underlying thesis is that a mass-production system of doctoring means everyone will get basically the same level of quality of care, rather than having some superstars and some real duds. But in the meantime, it's become so routine, and so highly practiced, that it's rapidly approaching parity with natural childbirth, as regards complications to mother and child, and he thinks at some point it'll be considered the default method for childbirth.
Re:Living in a desert (Score:3, Informative)
Try again...
[Citation [merriam-webster.com]
cited] [reference.com]
Re:Nonsense. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Nonsense. (Score:3, Informative)
I seem to remember one Asian country having an ungodly female-to-male ratio because of wars. I can't remember which one though... Anyone got a clue?
Well China has a very low female to male ratio because of the one child policy combined with the cultural value of sons. Not quite what you were going for, but it's the only thing I've heard of.