Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Biotech Idle

Texas Makes Zombie Fire Ants 398

eldavojohn writes "What do you do when a foreign species has been introduced to your land from another continent? Bring over the natural predator from the other continent. Scientists in Texas have introduced four kinds of phorid flies from South America to fight fire ants. These USDA approved flies dive bomb ants and lay an egg inside the ant. The maggot hatches and eats away juicy tender delicious ant brain until the ant is nothing more than a zombie that wanders around for two weeks before the head falls off and the ant dies. A couple of these flies will cause the ants to modify their behavior and this will be a very slow acting solution to curb the $1 billion in damage these ants do to Texas cattle ranches and — oddly enough — electrical equipment like circuit breakers. You may remember zombifying parasites hitting insects like cockroaches."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Texas Makes Zombie Fire Ants

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 13, 2009 @10:29PM (#27946925)

    Like this http://www.austmus.gov.au/factsheets/canetoad.htm

    Cane toads !!!!

    This little bastards will eat anything they can physically get in their mouths!

    A complete disaster.

  • Re:What stupidity. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by frieko ( 855745 ) on Wednesday May 13, 2009 @10:54PM (#27947069)
    What? As opposed to safe pest control methods like atrazine and DDT? When done by idiots (cane beetle) biological control can be disastrous. But when done carefully it's safe and effective. From Wikipedia:

    An example of an invasive species is the alligator weed. [...] The alligator weed flea beetle and two other biological controls were released in Florida. Because of their success, Florida banned the use of herbicides to control alligator weed three years after the controls were introduced.

  • Stock Tip... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by maz2331 ( 1104901 ) on Wednesday May 13, 2009 @11:03PM (#27947115)

    Whatever company that makes RAID (bug spray, not disk stuff)...

    BUY!

    The product will be needed soon, and in great quantities.

  • San Antonio (Score:2, Interesting)

    by lauless ( 1001669 ) on Wednesday May 13, 2009 @11:41PM (#27947355)
    This is the first year I have not seen any fire ants. It used to be a constant battle, and the bites hurt. A year or two ago the crazy ants showed up (Paratrechina longicornis). They are now everywhere and have evicted the fire ants. They rarely bite, but they are EVERYWHERE (in my yard). They even tried to move into my car. EVERYWHERE.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14, 2009 @01:07AM (#27947797)

    That works only if fire ants don't evolve to have multiple queens in one colony, like the fire ants here in Texas did. To add insult to injury, the worker fire ants will not feed all the queens the same foods, making it difficult to kill all the queens in a colony through poisoning.

  • Re:What stupidity. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Qubit ( 100461 ) on Thursday May 14, 2009 @03:32AM (#27948355) Homepage Journal

    Hence, sometimes people distinguish between animals and fish

    Animals and fish? I don't think I've ever heard that split before. People often say things like "well at least we're not animals," or "humans can contemplate their existence, unlike animals," however I feel like that just stems from not having a precise term defining the set of all animals, minus humans.

    Of course, even if we did have such a term, would it include homo sapiens sapiens and neanderthals? At what point would we be considered separate from the rest of the animal kingdom?

    Getting back to the animals, we have several terms that can mean different things. For example a vegetarian might say "I don't eat meat," but in common parlance of lots of cookbooks (especially cookbooks over a decade or two old) you have meat, poultry, fish, game, and pork.

    So-called pescetarians might eat plants + seafood, or just plants + fish. Wikipedia indicates that the word is a portmanteau of the Italian word pesce [wikipedia.org] ("fish") + vegetarian; if a person eats things beyond just fish (e.g. crustaceans), should we use a different word?

    "Omnivore" isn't much better, as I certainly don't eat everything. I can't even eat tomato plants and rhubarb leaves -- things that look remotely edible. But people generally understand each other, even if our words aren't as precisely specified as much people would like.

  • Re:What stupidity. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by The_mad_linguist ( 1019680 ) on Thursday May 14, 2009 @04:15AM (#27948557)

    Apparently a big component of the attraction is that electric-fried fire ants smell really good to other fire ants

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14, 2009 @04:31AM (#27948633)

    After a few horrendous early bad attempts (Cane Toads for example) Australia's CSIRO (the government's research arm) has gotten very very good [csiro.au] at importing biological controls to deal with other invasive species. They now have methodologies in place that let them do so on a regular basis.

    Examples include the moth that was used to eradicate Prickly Pear [sciencedirect.com],

    About the artice You've linked to: what is worth mentioning here, is that while you can read between the lines that in Australia this "environmental engineering" was in fact successful, for unknown reasons it failed in Kruger National Park, South Africa...
    WM

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14, 2009 @04:54AM (#27948709)

    This is why we in Denmark join words. The headline would read:
    Texas Makes Zombiefireants

    The problem is when people then forget to join them. Because we are used to joined words, it makes it extra hard to not read the ambiguous meaning.

  • by mangu ( 126918 ) on Thursday May 14, 2009 @05:42AM (#27948913)

    When they mentioned bringing the natural predator from another continent, I imagined this [linkbrazil.com.br].

    Now, that would be a cool animal to set loose in Texas!

  • by Hal_Porter ( 817932 ) on Thursday May 14, 2009 @06:10AM (#27949031)

    Have you read this

    http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf [apa.org]

    People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd.

    It's truly +1 Funny/Insightful. And yet highly disturbing (-1 Troll) too, because clearly everyone must have areas where they lack ability and also lack 'metacognitive ability' to know they lack ability. It's absolutely an awesome read the first time you do so.

  • by GooberToo ( 74388 ) on Thursday May 14, 2009 @11:25AM (#27951587)

    the first highly visible superpredator that you find, and bringing it back. (Cane Toads, Mongooses, Wolves, etc) ...and house cat...

    Australia has a bad feline problem too. They were imported to deal with ever increasing rodent populations as a result of the growing agro and ranching economy. Thankfully the Aborigines were quick to add them to their diet.

    It seems house cats have very poor endurance and can be stalked rather successfully. At the end of the hunt the Aborigines literally walk right up to it and smash its head. The cat is simply too tired to run any further.

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...