Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science Technology

Nuclear Testing Helps Identify Fake Vintage Whiskey 366

Hugh Pickens writes "Industry experts claim the market for vintage whiskey has been flooded with fakes that purport to be several hundred years old but instead contain worthless spirit made just a few years ago. Now researchers at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit have developed a method that can pinpoint the date a whiskey was made by detecting traces of radioactive particles created by nuclear bomb tests in the 1950s. '"It is easy to tell if whiskey is fake as if it has been produced since the middle of the twentieth century, it has a very distinctive signature," says Dr. Tom Higham, deputy director of the facility. Nuclear bomb testing in the 1950s saw levels of carbon-14 in the atmosphere rise around the world so the amount of isotope absorbed by living organisms since this time has been artificially elevated. Whiskey extracted from antique bottles is sent to the laboratory where scientists burn the liquid and bombard the resulting gas with electrically charged particles so they can measure the carbon-14 in the sample. In one recent case, a bottle of 1856 Macallan Rare Reserve was withdrawn from auction at Christies, where it was expected to sell for up to £20,000, after the scientists found it had actually been produced in 1950. "So far there have probably been more fakes among the samples we've tested than real examples of old whiskey," says Higham.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Nuclear Testing Helps Identify Fake Vintage Whiskey

Comments Filter:
  • Such a waste (Score:2, Informative)

    by ironicsky ( 569792 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @04:46PM (#27821019) Homepage Journal

    If a bottle of whiskey is supposedly worth $20,000, assuming its a 26oz bottle and they take even 1oz out for burning that drops the value almost a grand.
    Seems like an expensive waste to me.

  • Re:Taste (Score:2, Informative)

    by antagonizt ( 613384 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:10PM (#27821387) Homepage
    Whiskey unlike wine does not age in the bottle. A hundred year old bottle of crappy whiskey will taste as bad as a new bottle of crappy whiskey. When bottles of whiskey talk about age they are referring to the length of time it spent in the barrel.
  • Whiskey and its age (Score:5, Informative)

    by skwang ( 174902 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:10PM (#27821391)
    As a whisk(e)y connoisseur let me add my 2 cents with following points.

    1. The older a whiskey is the more expensive it gets due to rarity, not quality. Many people have a bias toward older whiskeys (whiskies) because they think they are better. Like wine, some whiskeys age well, others don't.

    2. Whiskey must be stored in oak barrels to age. Once it is out of the barrel, and in a bottle or steel vat, it no longer ages. So a 10 year old whiskey sitting in a bottle for 50 years is still a 10 year old whiskey.

    3. Whiskeys in barrels lose about 2% a year due to evaporation, known as the angel's share. That 2% is mostly water in hotter climates, but in cooler ones, like Scotland, what is lost is mostly alcohol. Thus a spirit which is put into a barrel at 60% alcohol by volume (ABV) will be reduced to 50% ABV then 40% ABV as time goes one. This is important because once the produce drops below 40% ABV, it can no longer legally be named whiskey. Thus whiskeys are usually never older than 40 years of age to due the angle's share.

    4. Whiskey is how it's spelled in the USA (where I am writing this.) In Britain and Canada it is spelled whisky. Since the article discusses whisky from The Macallan distillery (yes the "T" is capitalized), the article's title and summary misspelled "whisky."

  • by Anonymous EPA ( 1127109 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:11PM (#27821405)
    What they are testing is the stuff made in Scotland called "whisky".

    The brown spirit made in other countries (including Ireland, Japan, Canada and the country to the South of Canada) is called "whiskey". This is quite different.

    Only whisky attracts idiots to put silly values on bottles of the stuff they are never going to drink.

    The only proper thing to do to a bottle of whisky is drink it (not all at once ;-). The same applies to a bottle of whiskey, and after a few, you will no longer mind you don't actually have a bottle of whisky to drink.

    A

  • Not just whiskey (Score:5, Informative)

    by je ne sais quoi ( 987177 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:12PM (#27821431)
    Atmospheric contaminants are routinely used to date the age of groundwater (e.g., in wells) and even to measure the residence time for water in the watershed of rivers. The most commonly used radioactive element is the hydrogen isotope, tritium. You can see a curve for it here [eawag.ch], where the tritium level peaks in 1964 or so. You measure how much tritium is in the groundwater, then you compare it to that curve to which I linked after accounting for the decay of the tritium (half-life = 12.32 years), the match shows when that water fell as rainfall. Lot's of different contaminants are that way: CFC's used in air conditioners were useful until they were banned, SF6 is used in industrial transformers and does the same job.
  • by Fortunato_NC ( 736786 ) <verlinh75 AT msn DOT com> on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:12PM (#27821433) Homepage Journal

    Whiskey (or any liquor that is aged for flavor) only ages "in the barrel". Once it is bottled, it does not age anymore, because glass is inert. So if your grandfather bought a bottle of 12 year old Chivas in 1960 and left it gathering dust in his liquor cabinet for the next 49 years, you do not have 61-year old scotch, you have 12 year old scotch that's been in the bottle for 49 years. The value in these old bottles is not necessarily in their age per se, it's in their rarity - many of these old distilleries have long since ceased production and gone out of business, their recipes are lost, and the old bottles represent a legacy of sorts for the regional producers who thrived before giant corporations took over the production of spirits. It's kind of like buying NOS (new old stock) stickers for your MAME cabinet or arcade build. Only in this case, the "relics", such as they are, are a link to the past that simply can't be recreated once they're gone. The process that's descibed in the article ensure that the unscrupulous among us don't try to take advantage of people's desire to connect with that which came before.

  • by Hognoxious ( 631665 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:14PM (#27821453) Homepage Journal
    You quote a url and you can't even spell the key word right. Barbarian.
  • Re:Taste (Score:4, Informative)

    by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:14PM (#27821477)
    You can if you're the Highlander:
    • CONNOR: "Brandy. Bottled in 1783."
    • BRENDA: "Jesus. That's old."
    • CONNOR: "1783 was a very good year. Mozart wrote his Great Mass. The Montgolfier brothers went up in the first hot-air balloon. And England recognized the independence of the United States."
  • by JoshuaZ ( 1134087 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:17PM (#27821513) Homepage

    We can compare C-14 dating to other known dates. For example, C-14 dating agrees with dating from dendrochronology(the fancy word for counting tree rings). C-14 dating also agrees with other forms of radioactive dating and known historical data. We can be very sure there hasn't been any spike in the last 9000 years or so. Sudden spikes would also show and make a lot of archaeology just not look like it made any sense. And if there were any form of spike we'd likely see an impact in the ratios of other isotopes. If there had been substantial nuclear detonations for example, we'd be able to tell.

    A spike won't add a uniform extension or contraction to dates. For most forms of spiking, you'll get a lot of stuff looking like it is from a very short time period or you'll get a very large period where you don't see almost anything (depending on whether you have a process adding too much C-14 or reducing C-14 levels). We can be pretty sure that C-14 dating is accurate.

  • Re:Taste (Score:2, Informative)

    by steeph ( 85070 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @06:05PM (#27822243)
    No it ain't
    The real thing is Whisky.
    Irish stuff is Whiskey (and so is the US variant IIRC)
  • by confused one ( 671304 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @06:11PM (#27822347)

    Tennessee Whiskey = Bourbon for the nonconforming nonconformist.

    But just to confuse matters:
    Jack Daniels spelled it whiskey
    George Dickel spelled it whisky

    I prefer the George Dickel No. 12 or the Barrel Select myself.

  • by JoshuaZ ( 1134087 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @07:28PM (#27823569) Homepage
    The oldest trees aren't that old. However, we can match up tree rings from different trees to extend the data past that. The primary way of doing this is that temperature and water levels effect how much growth occurs and thus alters ring thickness. So if for example we have a tree that goes back back say a thousand years and then we have at the end a big ring, 22 big rings, a short ring, 4 big rings and then 2 short rings. If we find a dead tree that has that pattern at one point we can tentatively match the two segments up as corresponding to the same years. We can also cross confirm this with multiple tree lines and agreement in levels of various isotopes in the individual ring or sets of rings (this agreement is independent of any concern about spikes or similar issues since we are just looking for agrement of current levels, not trying to figure out the initial levels). The Wikipedia article on this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendrochronology [wikipedia.org] provides a good summary of the basics.
  • by Fortunato_NC ( 736786 ) <verlinh75 AT msn DOT com> on Monday May 04, 2009 @09:20PM (#27824955) Homepage Journal

    Beers and wines have yeasts in them that react with sugars remaining from the liquid's previous life as wort / fruit juice. "Aging" in these products refer to flavor changes resulting from the actions of these yeasts. Hard liquor has been distilled, possibly filtered, and the alcohol content is high enough to kill the hardiest yeast. Whiskey is "aged" by storing in charred casks and allowing tannins from the wood to impart flavors to the liquor - the longer the whiskey is in the wood, the more tannins. Put the whiskey into glass bottles, and the aging stops. I stand by my original comment.

  • by linzeal ( 197905 ) on Tuesday May 05, 2009 @02:23AM (#27827213) Journal
    You can just do electrolysis and make pure water.

So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand

Working...