NASA Tests Heaviest Chute Drop Ever 226
Iddo Genuth writes "NASA and the US Air Force have successfully tested a new super-chute system aimed at reclaiming reusable Ares booster rockets. On February 28, 2009 a 50,000-pound dummy rocket booster was dropped in the Arizona desert and slowed by a system of five parachutes before it crashed to the ground. The booster landed softly without any damage. This was possibly the heaviest parachute drop ever, and NASA is planning to perform even heavier drops of up to 90,000 pounds in the next few months."
1 Question (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:1 Question (Score:1, Insightful)
What would you have us use in stories about the US?
Kilograms don't mean anything to us.
Re:1 Question (Score:4, Insightful)
crashed softly? (Score:5, Insightful)
WTF? If it "landed softly" it didn't "crash".
Re:Cool - now how much ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Besides, most accidents are on takeoff, landing, or when the pilot didn't notice the mountain. No time to deploy parachutes.
Re:A good start (Score:5, Insightful)
More importantly, how can the submitted article say the rocket "crashed" yet then immediately afterward say it landed softly. Are those two terms not mutually exclusive?
I suppose one could have a soft "crash landing" in an airplane, with the definition of a "crash landing" being: An unscheduled landing due to mechanical problems. But in this case, the parachute system apparently worked flawless ly, exactly as it was designed. So even the loosest definition of "crash" would not fit.
Can someone please fix the article?
Perhaps to this:
Thanks.
Re:crashed softly? (Score:3, Insightful)
You left out "Before it"
Re:1 Question (Score:3, Insightful)
As far as I'm concerned things like the units used in Gas/Petrol, glasses of beer, road signs, and the side of the road we drive on all are a part of a country's culture and there's no huge need to change them. Sure it would make things simpler for people visiting, but it's not a necessity.
Measurements used in scientific experiments on the other hand I feel should be standardized. The scientific community isn't just based in one country, and using a bunch of different measurements isn't only an inconvenience, it's dangerous. People will make conversion errors, things will go wrong. NASA should know this by now.