Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Satellite Collision Debris May Hamper Space Launch 131

Matt_dk writes "The debris from a recent collision involving two communications satellites could pose a serious threat for future launches of spacecraft into a geostationary orbit, a Russian scientist said on Friday. Future launches will have to be adjusted with regard to the fact that the debris [from the collision] has spread over an 800-km area and will gather at a common orbit in 5-6 years."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Satellite Collision Debris May Hamper Space Launch

Comments Filter:
  • Geostationairy? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by im_thatoneguy ( 819432 ) on Saturday February 21, 2009 @09:26PM (#26945411)

    Wait a second. I thought the collision was at like 300mi altitude. Now they'r saying this causes problems at Geosynchronous orbit? I thought GEO was at like 30,000 miles above the earth. Also... I didn't think the shuttle planned on traveling that high anyway.

    What am I missing?

  • by John Hasler ( 414242 ) on Saturday February 21, 2009 @09:52PM (#26945527) Homepage
    Vaporizing the crap is not feasible, nor is putting extremely large lasers in orbit. Fortunately, neither is necessary. You build a very high peak-power pulse laser on the ground and use it to hit the bits of debris with femtosecond pulses that vaporize a few micrograms off each of them. The vapor acts like a rocket engine, its reaction force slightly changing the orbit. Hit each bit again every time it comes around and soon it is in a decaying orbit. Space Broom [wikipedia.org]
  • Pedantic (Score:3, Interesting)

    by MushMouth ( 5650 ) on Saturday February 21, 2009 @10:49PM (#26945803) Homepage

    They are actually called Canada Geese http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_goose [wikipedia.org]

  • by SlashV ( 1069110 ) on Sunday February 22, 2009 @10:45AM (#26948423) Homepage
    I don't understand why these satellites collided in the first place. I understand NASA tracks pretty much all objects larger than a bolt in orbit. Why wasn't the collisision predicted and prevented ? The Iridium satellite was still active as I understand it, so it must have had some capability still to avoid the collision. Can someone enlighten me here ?
  • 800 Km area? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by stoicio ( 710327 ) on Sunday February 22, 2009 @12:19PM (#26948975) Journal

    There appears to be some 2 dimensional thinking going on here.
    The statement '8 Km area' would lead one to believe that the debris has
    spread out over a flat plane.

    Obviously, when things collide in space, there is more of a
    cloud of debris than a pool table of debris.

    What is th actual **VOLUME** and 3 dimensional scale of the problem
    and where is it located in 3 dimensional space?

    The debris is also not static. It will continue to move and expand
    in orbit.

Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.

Working...