Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government United States Science News

Chu's Final Breakthrough Before Taking Office 233

KentuckyFC writes "While preparing for the job of US Secretary of Energy in the incoming Obama administration (and being director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and a Nobel Prize winner to boot), Steven Chu has somehow found time to make a major breakthrough in the world of atom interferometry. One measure of an interferometer's sensitivity is the area that its arms enclose. Chu and colleagues have found a way to increase this area by a factor of 2,500 by canceling out the noise introduced by lasers, which work as beam splitters sending atoms down different arms (abstract). One thing this makes possible is the use of different types of atoms in the same interferometer, allowing a new generation of tests of the equivalence principle. (This is the assumption that the m in F=ma and the m's in F= Gm1.m2/r^2 are the same thing). Let's hope he's got equally impressive breakthroughs planned for his encore as US Secretary of Energy."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Chu's Final Breakthrough Before Taking Office

Comments Filter:
  • Not "final" (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Eravnrekaree ( 467752 ) on Sunday January 18, 2009 @11:32PM (#26512331)

    The title seems to imply he wont make any more breakthroughs after taking office. Yet I hope and I think that he should continue to due science work even after taking office and there is no reason why he couldnt.

  • Nice Change (Score:3, Interesting)

    by zwekiel ( 1445761 ) on Sunday January 18, 2009 @11:46PM (#26512453)
    It's a nice change from the previous high level government officials of the Bush Administration, who were appointed not based on their knowledge and experience in a given field, but their willingness to bend the truth according to the Bush administration dogma.
  • Re:For the Record... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by artor3 ( 1344997 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @12:36AM (#26512747)

    Chu is a big name, so its hard to tell whether he was the driving force behind this research, or tossed on the list of authors to get funding. Muller is an Assistant Professor. Chiow is a post-doc.

    Herrman, I can't find a position for via a quick google search, but it looks like he's been putting out papers under Muller for 5 years, which means he's been working under him even longer. The only way you'd work under one person for that long without having a larger internet presence is as a meek and lowly grad student.

    Therefore, my guess is this - Muller or Chu comes up with idea. Chu gets funding. Muller does the over-arching theory behind the idea (probably with help from Chu). Chiow leads in actual lab work, while Herrman does the grunt work. But hey, at least its better than being an undergrad. Those poor saps probably got jobs like "write down the number on this display every ten minutes for the next four hours", and they don't even end up getting listed.

  • Re:Nice Change (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Jah-Wren Ryel ( 80510 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @12:38AM (#26512753)

    It's a nice change from the previous high level government officials of the Bush Administration, who were appointed not based on their knowledge and experience in a given field, but their willingness to bend the truth according to the Bush administration dogma.

    That was my initial reaction. But at that level of responsibility I much prefer someone being appointed for their competency to manage well rather than their ability to do technical work. I have no idea if Chu is a good manager or not, just saying that the Peter Principle is something to be avoided.

  • Re:Nice Change (Score:2, Interesting)

    by jo42 ( 227475 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:35AM (#26513039) Homepage

    What makes you think Bush appointees where good managers? Or where even close to being competent for the position they where appointed to?

  • by symbolset ( 646467 ) * on Monday January 19, 2009 @03:03AM (#26513411) Journal

    At least it should not be a national goal to take the people who are expanding the realm of human knowledge and chain them to a desk managing federal middle managers. It's cruel. It's wasteful.

    Kudos to the incoming administration for being able to figure out who the thinkers in their country are. That's a refreshing change from the previous administration. Now please - for the sake of us all - when you identify them, leave them in place and appoint administrators to get stuff out of their way. For all our sakes, don't take them from their honest work and make lobbyists out of them. I'd rather you set money on fire. Really.

  • by RazorSharp ( 1418697 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @10:11AM (#26515207)

    . . . between Obama and Bush. Bush appointed a professional politician (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Abraham) and then someone slightly more qualified, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_W._Bodman), a venture capitalist who had attended MIT. Abraham had nothing to do with energy Bodman has done nothing but executive positions for the last thirty years. Obama chose someone who's really qualified and isn't financially tied to our current energy industries. Considering that the inauguration is tomorrow and this man is still hard at working trying to provide energy solutions only confirms what an excellent choice he is.

    The ineptitude of the Bush administration isn't just in the man himself, it was the slew of yes-men appointed to important positions that has made our government ineffective for the last eight years.

With your bare hands?!?

Working...