Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Mars

Massive Martian Glaciers Found 314

Kozar_The_Malignant writes "Scientific American is reporting that 'data from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter point to vast glaciers buried beneath thin layers of crustal debris.' Data from the surface-penetrating radar on MRO revealed that two well-known mid-latitude features are composed of solid water ice. One is about three times the size of the City of Los Angeles. This certainly makes the idea of establishing a station on Mars far more plausible."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Massive Martian Glaciers Found

Comments Filter:
  • SciAm sucks (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 20, 2008 @11:14PM (#25841423)

    (American Scientist is much better)

    The original NASA press release is at

    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/news/mro-20081120.html [nasa.gov]

  • Re:Why? (Score:2, Informative)

    by GorgarWillEatYou ( 523390 ) on Thursday November 20, 2008 @11:34PM (#25841553)
    Solid
  • Re:Why? (Score:5, Informative)

    by hkmarks ( 1080097 ) on Thursday November 20, 2008 @11:44PM (#25841607)

    "Ice" and "metal" have different meanings in planetary science than regular old chemistry. "Ice" can refer to any solid "volatile" substance (water, ammonia, methane, hydrogen...) and "metal" (IIRC) refers to other solids (carbon, silicon, iron...). Since lots of carbon dioxide ice has been found on mars in the past, it's worth making the distinction.

    Also, when you're talking about the makeup of stars, "metal" refers to everything other than hydrogen or helium.

    IANA astronomer, planetary geologist, etc.

  • Re:Fossil water (Score:4, Informative)

    by IHateEverybody ( 75727 ) on Friday November 21, 2008 @01:58AM (#25842355) Homepage Journal

    I know, but even if it's a failed planet -- might whatever reason it failed also be why Mars now lacks a proper atmosphere??

    Our atmosphere is protected by the Earth's magnetic field because it deflects the ionized particles which make up the Sun's powerful solar wind. Earth's magnetic field is produced by the rotation of its liquid outer core. Mars by contrast has a completely solid core and no magnetic field. Combined with its smaller size and lower gravity (about a third of the Earth's gravity) this lack of a magnetic field is the reason why Mars' atmosphere eroded away.

    The reason for the "failed planet" that produced the asteroid belt is probably Jupiter. Jupiter's gravity is strong enough to pull material out of asteroid belt on a regular basis. If you combined all of the material in the asteroid belt, the resulting "planet" would be less massive than Mercury.

  • by IHateEverybody ( 75727 ) on Friday November 21, 2008 @02:07AM (#25842407) Homepage Journal

    Phoenix was designed to dig a few inches into the ground. The glaciers in the linked article are probably buried a lot deeper. It actually would be more realistic to send Bruce Willis and his oil drillers to Mars to dig for ice than it was to send them to the asteroid in that movie....

  • MRO videos (Score:3, Informative)

    by smoker2 ( 750216 ) on Friday November 21, 2008 @08:35AM (#25843995) Homepage Journal
    It's a pity that NASA chooses to use quicktime as their movie format. I can't even get mplayer to open the streams.
  • Re:Time to move... (Score:3, Informative)

    by CrimsonAvenger ( 580665 ) on Friday November 21, 2008 @01:42PM (#25847867)

    the "New World" settlers werent in "danger" of contracting diseases from the "New World"... the diseases were from the "old world".

    Oh? Don't I recall correctly that syphilis came back to Europe after the explorers "fraternized" with the local women?

Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein

Working...