Chinese Astronauts Complete First Spacewalk 310
As_I_Please writes "At 8:40AM (GMT) this morning, Chinese astronaut Zhai Zhigang successfully spent 18 minutes in a tethered spacewalk outside the spacecraft Shenzhou 7. This is an important step in China's goal of building an orbiting space station and sending astronauts to the moon."
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:2, Insightful)
I think it's something about announcing launches, with detailed transcripts of conversations, before they happen. Sending underage athletes to international events, swearing they're of age even after evidence is found that they're not. Sadly, the list goes on and on.
At some point, distrust and skepticism becomes the norm.
Your point is well taken that all governments lie, and necessarily so. Some governments lie a lot about things that don't seem worth lying about.
Why this anti-chinese winds? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why are all posts so anti-chinese?
I love democracy and I live in a liberal western democratic country (Sweden), but I do not at all understand why all posts have to be so negative.
Lets critisize china when they do something bad. When they do something good like this, lets congratulate them! This is a great step forward, not only for china, but for all of humankind.
I honestly believe that China will be the space super-power during the 21st century and the faster they get there the better for ALL OF US - EVEN AMERICANS!
So lets just cheer and celebrate this success! Congratulate the astronauts and engineers that made this possible. It is impressive and it is a fantastic work no matter if you are a russian, american or chinese.
competition (Score:5, Insightful)
That's not quite the point... (Score:5, Insightful)
The point is that they are building their space program. You have to consider Asian, and especially East Asian thinking. They aren't like the west with its "profit immediately or forget about it" thinking. When I see China putting men into space (the third country to do so after Soviet Russia and then the USA) and now doing space walks, that means they already have a long term plan to set up semi-permanent if not permanent colonies in orbit or on other celestial bodies.
See, they are not in a space race. They are doing this for their more distant future. When they do something like this, they aren't thinking of the next quarter's profits or even the next year's. They are thinking in terms of the next generation or the generation after.
And, I applaud them for it. It is nice to see homo sapiens thinking long term about getting off this pale blue dot of ours, and not only thinking about it but taking active steps towards such a goal. I couldn't care less what language they are speaking or what country they are from. They are humans and they are making the effort that others seem to have given up on. Power to them.
Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? (Score:3, Insightful)
Jealousy, of course (Score:4, Insightful)
China is sending men into space. We are scrapping our only way of getting into space. Talk about progress...
Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? (Score:2, Insightful)
Wow, refreshingly sober post amid considerable "my penis is shrinking and I have to strike out at somebody" comments.
I guess some people just cannot stand others doing well, especially when their own economy is in the toilet, crime is getting out of control, and their own society is in almost certain decline.
Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? (Score:2, Insightful)
Because they're an authoritarian government that lies all the time?
that sounds like a certain western country we all know about
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think it's that unusual for a press agency to write about events before they happen. They're expected to put out a release almost immediately to various wires (like AP), or they'll get scooped by other reporters and bloggers.
I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and suggest that they wrote the release as I would expect, and it somehow got out before it should have.
You can also bet that both of our US Presidential candidates are already working on their acceptance speeches, and will have them completed days before the election even takes place. I'm sure their campaigns' press releases already have quotes in them, too.
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:0, Insightful)
American shit-eaters of the broken economy country are jealous again!!!
Your country is a piece of shit and owes to China more than 5 trillion dollars in foreign debit!
You are the most pathetic loser place in the planet! You are falling down hard and quick!
That is why China, and Russia, and Venezuela, and Iran, and North Korea and all the other countries you invaded and explored are getting together for the day that we going to destroy your pathetic country and take our revenge!
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:5, Insightful)
i would have agreed with you when i first read that article yesterday, but i couldn't understand why the Chinese government would lie about a launch that they already spent so much time and money preparing for, and were clearly going to carry out.
it wasn't until some other slashdotters remarked that this could have simply been a prepped news story, which is a common practice in mainstream media, and that the transcripts were probably holder text--still a bad idea i think, but at least understandable.
and it should be noted that this time there was live video footage. and it would be a pretty stupid thing to try to fake a space mission. i mean, cheating in the olympics, or any other sports, is something that you can get away with (and i have no doubt that plenty of countries have gotten away with on many occasions), but faking a space mission is more along the lines of lying about achieving cold fusion. there's just simply no way you can deceive people about that for more than a few weeks or months at most. so unless they plan on being ridiculed by the world later, it would be a very stupid thing to do.
Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? (Score:4, Insightful)
Because they're an authoritarian government that lies all the time?
As compared to our pseudo-authoritarian government that lies all the time?
Sure I can speak out against the government and not worry about being hauled off (generally), but the USA actually has a greater ratio of its citizens in prisons than China does in there.
So statically, if you are an US citizen you are more likley to be in prison than you are a Chinese citizen. Maybe we just have more criminals over here, but sometimes it just feels like this anti-Chinese sentiment is pot calling kettle black.
Also the top three nations of users of the death penalty are China, Iran, and the US (in that order). Seems like we have a lot in common.
Sometimes I start to wonder to myself that the only difference between the USA and China is that over there they know they aren't free while over here we're just duped into thinking that we are until we actually break a law.
Yeah, given the choice I'd rather live here than over there, but sometimes I wonder if only that pent up frustration against China could be directed at our own government so that we can actually someday hopefully change the path towards a more democratic state for everyone and not just those are in the majority way of thinking.
Long-term planning (Score:5, Insightful)
Riiiiight. Because putting melamine in milk powder and antifreeze in toothpaste isn't about immediate profits, it's a long-term strategy for building a trusted brand.
Re:Long-term planning (Score:2, Insightful)
Face it, Western farmers didn't know what would happen from feeding sheeps' brains to cows. And Chinese manufacturers didn't know the consequences of spiking milk with melamine -- they thought they were improving the milk. You're just a hypocrite if you think only China makes fatal mistakes.
it is the same business (Score:3, Insightful)
While they can make up whatever high goals -- to boost nationalism, to save the world, or whatever -- the entire execution is contingent on money and profits. China is a highly profit-driven place; a lot more than rich places. Companies have to see profits to do the tasks. And just like the U.S. and everywhere else in the world, China has to face the hurdle of creating job opportunities. Huge projects like these can save thousands jobs in their defunct state-owned factories. They also need to absorbs millions of college graduates every single year. Along the lines, officials also need to use these opportunities to take bribes to profit themselves.
That's exactly what happen in the U.S.: many companies need NASA projects for which they will hire thousands of people. Think about the scenario of laying off all the workers for the Shuttle program. Along the line, the politicians need to get donations.
So while pride and nationalism may play a role, these are largely about business and money.
Re:That's not quite the point... (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes and no.
In China, the lack of democracy means that you could plan for a distant future, as opposed to how you could get yourself (or your party) elected next term. In the west it's not "profit immediately or forget it" -- but rather "profit immediately, or otherwise the other party will revert it next term". China's current top-down approach in administration means it could move things with a definite purpose, rather than many individual working on their own interests.
But then, short term thinking is a common trait of the human species. On a national scale China is definitely heading in a clear and steady direction, but in smaller things I doubt there's much differences between the Chinese and anything else. For example, The Chinese, despite official prohibition, are really into gambling -- more so than the average westerner. And of course gambling is going to cause you to lose a lot of money in the long run...
The milk crisis in China now is of course another example as pointed out by another poster.
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:3, Insightful)
You mean the fireworks that actually happened? How much do you know about your supposed fake fireworks anyway?
Re:That's not quite the point... (Score:4, Insightful)
What was the point of landing on the moon? Advancement of humanity, or inspiring the nation? "Propaganda benefits", you could say. We just really, really needed to prove that we could beat the Soviets.
Re:Long-term planning (Score:5, Insightful)
Of course they knew exactly what they were doing. According to this article in April of 2007 from the New York Times [nytimes.com] it was an open "secret" that melamine could increase the appearance of protein in animal and human food products without adding any nutritional value.
I'm amazed at how many apologists there are for these violations of public health by Chinese businesses and the lack of oversight by the Chinese government, a government that has no accountability to anyone. And because of how much China exports these corrupt business practices affect the health of people outside their borders.
I for one try, as much as possible, to avoid any products that come from China because I have no idea what I'm getting.
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:3, Insightful)
Well... except there are a lot of countries out there (ours very much included) with lots of technology watching the sky. I would *think* that if you wanted to fake something in Space, you'd need to have NASA complicit in your hoax. I kind of doubt that happened.
I'm skeptical of China too. But, I love space. Congrats guys, amazing accomplishment.
Re:Why this anti-chinese winds? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:That's not quite the point... (Score:3, Insightful)
None of the above.
The moon landing sent one message quite clearly:
The People's Republic of China's main goal with their space program is, very likely, the Republic of China.
China feeds our greed; cf child slaves in W.Africa (Score:5, Insightful)
And because of how much China exports these corrupt business practices affect the health of people outside their borders.
I for one try, as much as possible, to avoid any products that come from China because I have no idea what I'm getting.
You know what. China is serving global demand. Global business demands profit at all and any cost. Consumers don't care who sewed their shirts, that those people despite working hard can't afford healthcare and education.
They say "don't care was made to care". Well the developed nations have sown the seed of their contempt for the humanity of the people of those manufacturing nations by not caring except about price. Now we're beginning to reap what we have sown.
You've all heard of companies using child/slave labour. Clothing manufacturers, computer makers. Much of the worlds chocolate supplies are tainted with slavery #1 ... none of these companies go out of business.
But now our constant drive for the bottom line is affecting the health of our home nations, now will we sit up and say no to globalised exploitation?
---
#1 about 50% of cocoa comes from West Africa (Ivory Coast, Ghana, Mali) where child slavery (abduction of children to work for no money) was considered widespread in 2001/2002. I have never seen any reports of a solution to this problem. See eg, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/1963617.stm [bbc.co.uk] http://www.365act.com/actions/2.html [365act.com] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/apr/19/globalisation.benstafford [guardian.co.uk];
Other sources http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_exploitation_in_the_chocolate_industry [wikipedia.org] particularly http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/24/news/international/chocolate_bittersweet.fortune/ [cnn.com] (read that one if nothing else).
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:5, Insightful)
"These folks have done in 10 years what has taken over 100 in the US in terms of industrialization and economics."
They bought a capsule design from Russia (and modified it to their needs) and then designed their own EVA suit. I think from 1959-1969 we pulled off a bit more than that.
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:5, Insightful)
i think most people recognize that. it's a pretty ethnocentric attitude to think that only the U.S. can conduct legitimate space research and everything China does must have an ulterior motive behind it. of course, if you see China as the enemy, then you can't concede to the fact that they might be genuinely interested in space exploration or recognize any achievements by the Chinese people.
it's really saying that we can be proud of our own space program, but China can't be proud of theirs. frankly, i think the more countries venture into space, the closer humanity as a whole gets to the possibility of space colonization. so who cares what flag is sewn onto their uniform? the are far worse things to spend time and resources on than space exploration.
Re:Long-term planning (Score:3, Insightful)
And my point was that unlike western farmers feeding sheep brains to cows, Chinese manufacturers did know at least by early 2007 that melamine was dangerous. I know this is Slashdot and you're only an AC but did you even try to take two minutes to read the article that I posted the link for. If you did you would see it is clear that Chinese manufacturers were absolutely, 100% aware of exactly what they were doing.
Also, if you took the time to read the article you would see there was harm and foul in early 2007. So why has the Chinese government done nothing about it? Because they are not accountable to anyone. You see in a democracy us "westerners", as you put it, have a way to make our governments do what is right. It doesn't always work but it's better than communist elites that live a life of luxury without having to answer to anyone.
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:3, Insightful)
Press releases....sure. Transcripts!?
You're joking, right?
A press release for a successful mission would read like, "The People's Republic Of China successfully inserted their latest spaceship into LEO."
If it's circulated after the event it's non-fiction - provided the ship didn't actually burn on the launch pad. If it's circulated *before* the event has taken place it's called fiction....or, dare I say, propaganda. See the difference?
As far as the transcripts go, I take it with a grain of salt. China is so in the habit of blatantly attempting to make their shit smell like roses that their roses now remind me of cow manure. You guessed it, I'm totally mistrustful and very skeptical towards any Chinese press release.
As for your example of acceptance speeches for the two US Presidential Candidates...If either one of them released their acceptance speech before they we're elected, they'd be laughed off the ticket. That being said, any prepared entity(person/business/Gov't) makes preparations for eventualities. Releasing them early plays very well into propaganda stratagems - therefore, free thinkers are more inclined to question the motives behind the press release and question the validity of any future press releases.
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:2, Insightful)
Get your facts straight (Score:5, Insightful)
I am seeing a lot of uninformed, and often racist, sentiment regarding this. Here are the facts.
1. This is not a Russian capsule. The three module shape is dictated by the principles of capsule design in general, not by China simply buying a set of blueprints
2. They are not moving that slowly, they are simply being economical with the number of missions they fly. It took Russia and the US 4 years to get from men in space to spacewalks, it has taken China 5 years.
3. Their spending money on this whilst there are *gasp* still poor people on China is not something that can be criticised from a country bailing out wall street whilst letting the poor rot. At least Chinese people will eventually benefit from space technology. Who will benefit from bankers being insulated from the consequences of their actions? Everywhere has inequality. No reason to crucify China specifically for it.
4. Shenzhou is the most technologically advanced manned spacecraft flying. The Shuttle has more capability but it is nearing the end of its life and when it retires, Americans better get used to play to second fiddle to China for a while.
5. Being racist makes you a dick. Chinese people are just as capable of this as you are.
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:4, Insightful)
But then again they didn't have to invent industrialization first, they could buy industrial stuff from many suppliers. It's a bit like flying from Spain to the US and saying you're better than the discoverers because it was faster.
Re:Non-Chinese proof of this? (Score:3, Insightful)
Plus the US did it purely from their intelligence and work
Yes, and the best German scientists money could buy. [wikipedia.org]