Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Transportation Technology

Rockets To Race Over Wisconsin Skies 210

Iron Condor writes with a reminder that that the first race of the Rocket Racing League (last mentioned here in April, after its 2005 founding) is set to take place later this month at Oshkosh AirVenture 08. This race, says Iron Condor, "is exactly what it sounds like: NASCAR 1000m above ground in rocket-propelled airplanes. Created by X-prize founder/CEO Peter Diamandis, this is 'the next evolution of racing' (at least according to the promo video, which is definitely worth watching)..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Rockets To Race Over Wisconsin Skies

Comments Filter:
  • Wow. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by FlyingSquidStudios ( 1031284 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @04:01PM (#24232915)
    Amazing how they can make giant glowing polygons float in the sky for the planes to fly through.
  • Finally. . . (Score:3, Interesting)

    by smooth wombat ( 796938 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @04:02PM (#24232933) Journal

    a video I can watch because it's not Flash.

    That said, these don't look like rockets but are simply jets. Still interesting but not true rocket racing.

    If they really wanted to make it interesting, they should have the competitors fly through the canyon they show in the video.

  • Re:Oh yeah!!! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by snowgirl ( 978879 ) * on Thursday July 17, 2008 @04:11PM (#24233079) Journal

    Anyhow, they said it was just like NASCAR, so I figured the spectators would be rednecks.

    Yeah, when I saw "like NASCAR 1000m in the air", I was all, "oh great... ANOTHER NASCAR."

    Seriously, anyone who watches real racecar driving on circuits internationally just shivers when you suggest "NASCAR", because it's boring to watch. "Go fast, turn left," I've heard it described as. And then, Indy and Champcar spun off of F1, to go around in ovals...

    I remember playing a Indy race car simulator game back on the Apple ][e (yeah, old school racing sim!) and now I'm surprised looking back on it... the tires on the right-side are larger than the ones on the left... why? To help you turn left better... because SURPRISE! They're only going left!

    Compared to GT racing, F1 racing, and hell, even freaking Autocross ("put up cones; instant track! can I drive my civic?") are way cooler and more interesting to watch than a bunch of dumb americans chasing their tail all day long.

  • by jd ( 1658 ) <imipak@yahoGINSBERGo.com minus poet> on Thursday July 17, 2008 @04:31PM (#24233409) Homepage Journal
    If it's NASCAR-style, then it'll appeal to some folks but it just won't have the kind of hold that other racing leagues get. Formula 1 gets serious money, and world-class rally racing is just that - world-wide, with an audience few sports can compete with. These two are descendants of the old European city-to-city races, where racers where gentlemen first. NASCAR is descended from bootlegger contests where winning was more important than how.

    Rocket racing really needs to take the same road as the old-style European racing leagues, perhaps even taking that kind of idealistic "it's not the winning that counts" attitude even further. Anyone can make a fast rocket, but does it have style? Is it fast out of brute-force or because the design is the coolest hack ever? Award points for place, yes, but also for style. Why encourage crap designs and crap driving?

  • by whoever57 ( 658626 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @04:53PM (#24233785) Journal
    Towards the end of the promo video, there is a short clip from inside one of the planes (one can see "Castrol" on the canard wing and the plane is flying above a river) -- in the front, one can clearly see a propellor. WTF?
  • One word: smoke (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ghoti ( 60903 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @05:21PM (#24234127) Homepage

    The trailer looks cool, but there are tons of problems. This isn't going to look anywhere nearly as exciting in reality.

    First of all, they expect people to go there to watch the action on huge TVs? WTF? Why do that when you can stay at home and see it on TV? This is essentially a virtual sport, there's hardly anything to see in the real world (other than the take-off and the unavoidable fly-by).

    But the reason this isn't going to be anywhere near what the video shows is safety. These planes will have to keep a significant safety distance so they don't crash into each other. So no high-powered chases or planes flying through overlapping polygons. The other planes will only be tiny specks somewhere in the distance.

    Also, do you know how far the safety distance is behind a commercial plane? That's miles of airspace that can't be used due to turbulence in the plane's wake. Now imagine what the wake of a rocket plane is like!

    And finally, one word: smoke! These engines don't burn nearly as clean as the nice CGI suggests, ever seen a Shuttle launch? There will be tons of smoke, making it hard to see much, and increasing the safety distances even further.

    So apart from this being a hugely wasteful kind of sport (undoubtedly the most wasteful ever), it's also going to be boring as hell. Call me a nay-sayer, but I can't see this take off (no pun intended, haha).

  • Re:Doh! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by larkost ( 79011 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @05:58PM (#24234547)

    Most of the general cheeses are pretty bland stuff. However, you should go into a grocey store in Wisconsin and look in the "specialty cheeses" section, and you will find a wide selection of cheeses that routinely win international competitions.

    That being said, they still tend to cede the whole area of "stinky cheeses" to the french.

    And I have lived in Europe and Wisconsin and enjoy (and pay for) good cheese. I am living in California now, and miss the cheese.

  • Re:One word: smoke (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Deadstick ( 535032 ) on Thursday July 17, 2008 @06:35PM (#24234923)
    The other planes will only be tiny specks somewhere in the distance.

    Three words: Reno Air Races. Hotrodded WW2 fighters and some jets, 500+ mph, 10-mile course with the front straight a few hundred yards from the bleachers.

    Also, do you know how far the safety distance is behind a commercial plane? That's miles of airspace that can't be used due to turbulence in the plane's wake. Now imagine what the wake of a rocket plane is like!

    You mean like this? http://www.airrace.org/2007ncargallery.php [airrace.org] Wake turbulence depends almost entirely on weight, not airspeed.

    hugely wasteful kind of sport

    You're talking about a sport where a few dozen airplanes perform in front of fifty thousand people who got there in cars, right?

    rj

You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken

Working...