Vatican Says Alien Life Plausible 775
An anonymous reader writes "According to BBC, the director of the Vatican Observatory stated in an article titled 'Aliens Are My Brother' that intelligent beings created by God could exist in outer space. 'The search for forms of extraterrestrial life does not contradict belief in God. — Just as there are multiple forms of life on earth, so there could exist intelligent beings in outer space created by God.' Mind that this is not the same director who said that evolution is more than a mere theory — that was Father Coyne. I myself agree. There might be intelligent beings created by God in outer space even if there are none here on earth."
But of course... (Score:4, Insightful)
Three cheers for the Catholics! (Score:2, Insightful)
In fact, Catholic high schools even teach evolution, recognizing that you can still choose to believe in God as the creator alongside a belief in evolution as the mechanism of creation.
I see the acknowledgment of the possibility of alien life along this same vein. I wonder, though, how the creation of freaky-ass-bug-eyed aliens would fit into the "God created man is his own image" idea. Perhaps that God is so wacky and cool he can take on any shape?
Church foward thinking (Score:5, Insightful)
Scientific illiteracy here in the states is really bad, and I'm embaressed that my church has a more progressive attitude than our current administration. This should change with the next admin thankfully.
This is Slashdot, and everyone needs to get their 2 cents in, but please try to submit meaningful/useful posts.
Re:Catholics (Score:2, Insightful)
And who.. (Score:4, Insightful)
It's the same old problem of infinite regress when you try to state that a complex thing has to have a more complex designer. An über-powerful deity has to be much more complex than a human (or alien) and you end up with a bigger problem than the one you started with and you have explained exactly zero. And that's without even mentioning that there is no evidence of any form of supernatural creation of living beings (or anything else for that matter).
Re:Church foward thinking (Score:5, Insightful)
Do you imagine that the church would have made these statements without external pressure ?
Hell no, this is simply to inoculate the church against the inevitable progress in tolerance, and discovery and to try and carve out some future relevance.
Seems like the rock of the church is being eroded by the water of enlightenment - and about time too.
Re:Mythbusters (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:doubtful (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Catholics (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:But of course...A Serious Reply (Score:5, Insightful)
Therefore god must have created us in the image of the only part of him that doesn't change. His morality, his way of thinking and his personality. We have a dim image of this immutable portion of god.
Therefore aliens COULD look very different but still be created in his image.
The only remaining question is how did they get so many light years from eden?
Re:C.S. Lewis came to this conclusion years ago. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Impressive move by the Church (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:C.S. Lewis came to this conclusion years ago. (Score:2, Insightful)
Why assume that extra-terrestrial creatures would be any different than Earth animals in this regard? Even if an alien race existed that was "special" in the same way you believe humans to be special, that would not necessarily mean that the aliens would have their own original sin.
It applies here too (Score:2, Insightful)
It is a pretty old theological problem, as far I know the "consensus view" is that there probably exists some special arrangements for them.
Re:Mythbusters (Score:5, Insightful)
They also argue that if you pray for something really really hard, the invisible man in the sky might make it happen. So which is it? Is prayer useless because god never interferes? Or is god an egomaniacal prick, who'll let thousands of people die for no particular reason, but will intervene in human affairs when you ask him real nice like?
Re:Finaly! (Score:5, Insightful)
Group 1. Big Bang & Evolution. Essentially this version says, it all just happened, mostly by accident but with the amount of time and mass involved it was inevitable.
Group 2. Created by God (or gods). Essentially this version says it all originated from the imagination of a being with virtually unlimited intelligence and power.
You know what I find cool? That under both scenarios it's almost inevitable that we will encounter other intelligent life, somewhere out there.
Why? Because accidents tend to repeat when the conditions allowing them are also repeated. Sul isn't that uncommon a sun type so why shouldn't other Yellow dwarfs have wet rocky planets? And why shouldn't some of those mud-balls have critters on them ? Even intelligent critters?
As for the creation version. That makes it even more likely that the universe would be swarming with intelligent life. Religious people believe the Earth is teeming with life because God enjoys playing with DNA. So why wouldn't he just go wild when working with whole galaxies rather than just a single planet?
Re:Mythbusters (Score:5, Insightful)
The whole point is to believe in it against all odds and, specifically, despite the fact that nothing happens.
I find it weird, too.
OTOH, I can imagine that the mere act of such a submission to a state of mind can have certain desirable effects (and, of course, also undesirable ones). I don't think it's an accident that many other religions propagate a certain way of "giving up".
Re:Might be life? (Score:5, Insightful)
Belief in God is compatible with nearly any belief (Score:5, Insightful)
I can believe that the only two people in the world are Steven Hawking and Darl McBride and that ice cream is made from grub worms. If anyone provides me with evidence to the contrary, I can always say "Ah, but that's just what $DEITY wants you to think!"
The only thing a belief in a deity doesn't support is non-belief in a deity.
Re:Mythbusters (Score:1, Insightful)
When something good happens, God granted your wish. When something bad happens, it's part of God's plan, and he knows better hten us.
Remember, God works in Mysterious ways.
Re:Finaly! (Score:5, Insightful)
It says that there probably will be other intelligent life.
The chance of us meeting them is next to nothing.
Space is *big*.
Re:astronomer my asshole. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Finaly! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Mythbusters (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:Mythbusters (Score:5, Insightful)
I feel a lot better now that my life is my own to control. And its nice to know that sometimes bad things happen for no reason, and not because I've inexplicably displeased some supreme being.
Sorry, kind of off-topic, but I felt like sharing. The kind of logic you outlined in your post is probably the #1 reason I'm no longer religious. I always find it amusing that so many people view religion as comforting, since it was quite the opposite for me.
Re:Mythbusters (Score:5, Insightful)
So you hate the Catholic Church because their God (who happens to also be the Jew's God, Christian's God, and, come right down to it, the Muslim's God), drowned thousands of innocent children in a tsunami. Nevermind that He did NOT drown several billion other children that day.
I'm not sure if you're being serious, because my sarcasm detector is wonky, but are you seriously suggesting that not committing heinous atrocities is an admirable quality in a all-powerful being? That'd be like praising my friend John because, as far as I know, he hasn't killed anyone and dumped their bodies in the river. Or maybe like people who proudly state that they take care of their children, as if not leaving them to die in ditches is some extraordinary praise-worthy quality. Its kind of expected that normal people not do horrible things, much less omniscient, omnipotent beings.
Personally I'd like to describe God in terms other than "Allows thousands of people to die for no reason, but at least he isn't genocidal." Well as long as you ignore several books of the Old Testament.
Re:doubtful (Score:3, Insightful)
http://answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/are-ets-and-ufos-real [answersingenesis.org] is clearly not buying the whole alien thing.
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/35/story_3519_1.html [beliefnet.com] is open and suggest a path of Christ to have been presented to other worlds.
Re:Mythbusters (Score:2, Insightful)
Ah, I see. Can you tell me what the 3,000 people who died on September 11th learned from their experience? Having their bodies ground to dust must have been especially illuminating!
You got it. Millions of people before me also believed that the earth was flat, yet I know it to be round. Moreover, even though your church threatened to kill a great man for saying so, we also know that the world revolves around the sun, and not the other way around. Clearly "millions of people say it is so" is not a very good way of determining the truth.
While we're at it, where do you get the arrogance to NOT believe in Zeus and Athena? Millions of people before you believed in them! REPENT SINNER!
Seriously, it's not my arrogance that blinds me - it's my skepticism which gives me the tools I need to see. Believing is easy: all you have to do is listen attentively to what others tell you, memorize it, and then repeat it to yourself and others. It takes a lot more effort to question what you've been thought, and a lot more thought to come up with a logical alternative.
Well, Western Scientists are, without doubt, of a much higher overall intelligence than the rest of the population. And this elite group of intellects happens to be overwhelmingly atheist or agnostic - even in the US. So I'll let you figure out the answer to your own question.
In any event, as I said earlier, truth is not determined by voting. I don't give a damn if you can get 5.99999 billion people to all agree that fire isn't really hot - I'm still not going to throw myself onto that pyre. Why? Because no matter how many fools try to lie to me, I have the tools to analyze the world on my own. Why would I rely on the word of fanatics, frauds, tricksters, and charlatans, when I can use my mind instead?
Re:Mythbusters (Score:4, Insightful)
I just had a strange thought while wondering how to phrase my own thoughts on the nature of the universe (possibly multiverse? was reading a bit about it on wikipedia earlier) and how amazing it is that anything exists. I always get freaked out by it when I think about how something has just always been there. Even now.. it really just makes no sense. No science can explain it, religion can't explain it.. and my thought was that even if God exists then he could be just as confused at his own existence as I am about mine... It's just not possible to conceptualise something coming from nothing, or something just always being something. No matter how much I think the Universe makes no sense though, it still hangs on defiantly and makes the stairs in the hall creak.
Has any philosopher ever made a similar statement about God probably being as confused at his origins as we are?
Re:Finaly! (Score:4, Insightful)
in theory they don't need jesus (Score:1, Insightful)
nitpick (Score:5, Insightful)
So it should read "the bible stories can be made fit with evolution (which we know to be a very successful theory at explaining all life today as we know it)". It is not that evolution fits, it is that the bible is interpreted in the light of evolution.
Re:Finaly! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It's both (Score:2, Insightful)
AFAIK, Evolution is still a theory. A very convincing theory, I do not doubt that, but a theory nonetheless.
Exhuming a skeleton is not a fact that proves something about how life works, scientifically speaking, it is more a clue. Evolution is the best explanation found for all the scientific observations made on bones and live species, but it is not proven.
Evolution is the most likely scenario (by far, because no other theory have so many really convincing clues) but it is still not factual.
Re:Finaly! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Finaly! (Score:4, Insightful)
Second, assuming for a second the whole Christianity ball of wax is true, there's no reason that God wouldn't send down his other son, Skip, to some aliens, in a form they could understand. The ideals Jesus taught weren't restricted by a specific geography or biology. "Be nice to each other" might resonate as well on Argus-7 as it does on Sol-3.
Space is Big (Score:3, Insightful)
Meeting alien life isn't just a matter of somewhere, it's a problem of somewhen as well. There probably have been and will be countless instances of intelligent life that just never traverse the same space at the same time as another.
Misleading Title (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:nitpick (Score:3, Insightful)
Downright wrong (Score:3, Insightful)
In Genesis, the earth is created (1:1) before light (1:3), sun and stars (1:16); birds and whales (1:21) before reptiles and insects (1:24); and flowering plants (1:11) before any animals (1:20). The order of events known from science is in each case just the opposite.
A few clarification why it is not the correct order :
1) Bird were certainly late at the party after the reptile were created.
2) Sun and star were certainly created before planet and earth (heavy element were created in novae IIRC)
3) Whales are mammalians, a late addition to the animal worlds. Certainly came after the reptilians and insects.
4) more damning as said above angiosperm are a late addition only 130+ million year old roughly [tolweb.org]
Quote : " 2. Go throgh a textbook on evolution with the list you wrote in step one and you will discover something very odd. Same order."
Only if you don't know when flower came into the evolutionary tree, ignore that whale are mammals, ignore that byrd are late addition too, ignore basic astronomy. Oh well anyway let us ignore science altogether , and you are right