EV71 Outbreak In China Sparks Fears For Olympics 199
OMNIpotusCOM writes "CNN is reporting an outbreak of Enterovirus 71 (or EV71), that has affected more than 3700 children and killed over 20, is creating concern for the visitors and athletes expected for the Beijing Olympics in August. The virus can cause 'poliolike paralysis,' according to the article."
When tourists return to their home contries... (Score:3, Insightful)
Sweet dreams.
Consideration (Score:5, Insightful)
Perspective Comments (Score:2, Insightful)
Killed 20 children. How many children are there in China? or Peking?
How many car accidents were there, or murders. Who cares, basically.
Nerd/News/Importance Factor Zero.
Re:Should I be scared ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Conspiracy comments in... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Should I be scared ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Can be said better? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Should I be scared ... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:news for nerds... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Let's cancel the olympics (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Should I be scared ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What could go wrong (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:What could go wrong (Score:3, Insightful)
Your discounting of the deadliness of this virus is also not very reassuring. The percentage of deaths of those affected is high enough to cause me concern (perhaps even higher than the death rate of the Spanish Flu.). But that's far from the only problem. Those affected with polio like symptoms and other serious problems are likely to number far greater. And any statement that it is mild in adults should alarm any thoughtful person; how many adults who pick up the virus and only show a "mild" reaction will be likely to carry it back home, rather than wait out an extended stay in China? A "mild in adults but deadly in children and the elderly" virus is just the thing to cause a pandemic.
You hit the nail on the head with the pollution issue. It is likely to be a health issue. And so anyone who does pick up the virus and show "mild" symptoms is even more likely to just attribute it to the pollution and not stay around the polluted city for an extended stay. So the virus spreads, but people can claim "Oh, I though I was just sick from the pollution". Gee, who could have seen this coming?
Yea, the US government are real scum and villains too. Talk about off-topic. But I don't see how this makes China any better. I see very little chance that they will react properly if they find there is a growing problem, based on their past record and the loss of face that any health provisions during the Olympics would cause.
There is FUD, and then there is common sense. Those who just dismiss all problems as the former lack the latter.
Re:Let's cancel the olympics (Score:3, Insightful)
Amen to that. It used to be that olympic athletes held "amateur status," -- they weren't allowed to accept any form of payment for their sport. Jim Thorpe [wikipedia.org] had his medals stripped because he got paid to play baseball in the *minor leagues*, which barely paid to put food on his table.
Overcompetition killed the olympics. The Olympics used to basically be, "Bob the Carpenter happens to be good at shot-put, so let him represent our country as an average citizen." I'd honestly watch them if it were amateur athletes competing again -- it's fun to think that, with enough working out in my spare time, I too could be an olympic cyclist. Now it's just mega-million athletes wearing logos from a shoe manufacturer that uses slave labor to make the money...not exactly something to be proud of.
Re:Can be said better? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Let's cancel the olympics (Score:4, Insightful)
Let's not throw away money. But OTOH, let's NOT die "sad but rich".
The only problem with this logic is that you want to compel under threat of force individuals to contribute to the building of Colosseums. That's what taxes are - they're not some kind of charity. Choose not to pay them and you'll see the not-so-nice side very quickly.
I'm not some kind of anti-tax nut - taxes are certainly essential to run the primary functions of government which are essential. I'm not entirely opposed to some aspects of social justice as well within reason. However, when you're talking about building sports megacomplexes why not let those who make the money spend the money? Just have the International Olympic Organization fund the construction of the facilities they use (or choose to use existing facilities). They can recoup those costs through ticket sales and television rights. They'll need to regulate their spending so that they break even.
As soon as you make the organization that runs the olympics pay for the olympics you'll start to see them question whether we need events that nobody actually watches, and whether the facilities REALLY need to be built to a given standard. You'll also see them asking questions like - why do all the events have to be held at the same time in the same place? Why not just host them all over the place at various times durning the year and just use existing facilities?