Russia To Build an Orbital Construction Plant 182
jamax writes "Russia plans to build an orbital plant for the production of spacecraft (link to sketchy Google translation of the Russian original) that are too big to build planetside, or are just too bulky to fire into orbit once built. Presumably these are the ships we would fly to the Moon and Mars. Plans seem to be rather sparse at the moment, with the tentative construction date set for 2020, after the ISS is scheduled for decommissioning."
on-orbit assembly, finally (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Impressive...If It Works (Score:5, Interesting)
those Russians (Score:1, Interesting)
The only new thing about it is the idea that a (set of) module(s) could detach and make a trip to another planet.
Wouldn't put too much faith in this (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:SEI/Space Station Freedom anyone? (Score:3, Interesting)
Canadians will pwn them. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Not sure this will work (Score:3, Interesting)
I think Bigelow Aerospace would disagree. They already have prototype space station modules in orbit, and in the next few years they'll be launching up more of them and linking them together into larger stations. Robert Bigelow seems to think he can make a profit on it, and is betting a few hundred million of his own dollars on it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigelow_Aerospace [wikipedia.org]
Re:Ret-con (Score:3, Interesting)
Or more likely, because he felt that it was a city the represented a look ahead and was cosmopolitan enough to get a feel for what Roddenberry felt the future should look like?
Actually, America MIGHT be interested (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Impressive...If It Works (Score:2, Interesting)
Well yeah but...commercial space travel to the moon or Mars? We just barely got those commercial rockets into suborbital space...4 more years and they might finally hit orbital travel...
I'm not saying that commercial travel isn't feasible for the U.S., but just not in a 4 year timeframe that you think...
Re:One small step... (Score:3, Interesting)
China on the other hand, is an ethnic powderkeg(Tibet is just the tip of the iceberg) only kept together by guns and economic growth. From an economic standpoint, they have to deal with long-term environmental damage on a never before seen scale, a rapidly aging economy(unexpected side-effect of the one child policy), and very high rates of inflation.
If I had to pick, I'd say that Russa seems like the better bet.