Nanoclusters Break Superconductivity Record 138
KentuckyFC writes "A couple of years ago, two Russian physicists predicted that metal nanoclusters with exactly the right number of delocalized electrons (a few hundred or so) could become strong superconductors. Now an American group has found the first evidence that this prediction is correct in individual aluminium nanoclusters containing 45 or 47 atoms. And they found it at 200 K (abstract). That's a huge jump over the previous record of 138K for a high-temperature superconductor. There are a few caveats, however. The result is only partial evidence of superconductivity and the work has yet to be peer-reviewed. But its mere publication will set scientists scrambling to confirm. And 200K! That's practically room temperature in the Siberian winter."
Re:GODDAMIT (Score:5, Funny)
Re:GODDAMIT (Score:4, Funny)
in soviet russia even our electrons (Score:5, Funny)
oh never mind. the idea was Russian but the result was in the US
What's a "strong" superconductor? (Score:5, Funny)
Isn't that like a "strong" Superman?
What would that make a "weak" superconductor? A conductor?
Yours sincerely,
- Puzzled, Intartubes.
Re:minus 73 ! (Score:4, Funny)
Exact? (Score:5, Funny)
That is the number range for exact ?
Re:GODDAMIT (Score:5, Funny)
Re:in soviet russia even our electrons (Score:2, Funny)
Sincerely Yours
Karma Whore
Re:GODDAMIT (Score:5, Funny)
Re:still a little chilly (Score:4, Funny)
- RG>
Re:still a little chilly (Score:2, Funny)
Perhaps a 200K superconductor would be more like a Shroud of Turin of materials science?