Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science

The Squid's Beak May Revolutionize Engineering 79

Ace905 writes "For years the razor-sharp beak that squid use to eat their prey has posed a puzzle to scientists. Squid are soft and fragile, but have a beak as dense as rock and sharp enough to break through hard shells. Scientists have long wondered why the beak doesn't injure the squid itself as is uses it. New research has just been published in the the journal Science that explains the phenomenon. One of the researchers described the squid beak as 'like placing an X-Acto blade in a block of fairly firm Jell-O and then trying to use it to chop celery.' Careful examination shows that the beak is formed in a gradient of density, becoming harder towards the tip end. Understanding how to make such hardness gradients could revolutionize engineering anywhere that 'interfaces between soft and hard materials [are required].' One of the first applications researchers envision is prosthetic limbs."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Squid's Beak May Revolutionize Engineering

Comments Filter:
  • Re:No comments? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 29, 2008 @09:31PM (#22908678)
    I'm still trying to reconcile:

    Understanding how to make such hardness gradients could revolutionize engineering anywhere that 'interfaces between soft and hard materials [are required].'

    with

    The Squid's Beak May Revolutionize Engineering

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 30, 2008 @10:22AM (#22911614)
    Using B to get from A to C is an engineering revolution?

    How the hell did we ever get into space?
  • Applications (Score:1, Insightful)

    by dbbd ( 837458 ) on Monday March 31, 2008 @04:43AM (#22919036)
    I wonder if these type of gradient based material could be used for artificial teeth. Today teeth implants are embedded into the jaw bones, but many times the bone thickness is not enough. If instead gum-hardness material could be interfacing the gum, yet be hard on the surface it could be a very good replacement for bridges.

Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.

Working...