European Space Agency Launches New Orbital Supply Ship 129
erik.martino brings us a story about the European Space Agency's successful launch of a new type of cargo ship to resupply the ISS. The first Automated Transport Vehicle (ATV), named after Jules Verne, is the "very first spacecraft in the world designed to conduct automated docking in full compliance with the very tight safety constraints imposed by human spaceflight operations." Among other things, it carries water, oxygen, and propellant to help boost the ISS to a higher orbit. We recently discussed NASA's need for a new cargo transport system. Quoting:
"Beyond Jules Verne, ESA has already contracted industry to produce four more ATVs to be flown through to 2015. With both ESA's ATV and Russia's Progress, the ISS will be able to rely on two independent servicing systems to ensure its operations after the retirement of the US space shuttle in 2010. It incorporates a 45-m3 pressurised module, derived from the Columbus pressure shell, and a Russian-built docking system, similar to those used on Soyuz manned ferries and on the Progress re-supply ship. About three times larger than its Russian counterpart, it can also deliver about three times more cargo."
Why do you think that? (Score:5, Informative)
Not trivial (Score:4, Informative)
Grapple arm? (Score:4, Informative)
You don't know what you are talking about. A grapple arm has never been used to dock a craft to ISS and never will. You may complain that the shuttle uses a human in the loop to dock with the ISS. I think the caution is warranted considering the orbiter weighs 285000 lbs and carries 7 crew. Orion will have a standard docking adapter and can fly unmanned. So will SpaceX and Taurus II.
Re:Why do you think that? (Score:3, Informative)
These days, they've gotten it to the point where it works quite well, although this certainly wasn't always the case.
Re:Grapple arm? (Score:4, Informative)
It won't be able to dock without help from the station's arm.
Re:Why do you think that? (Score:5, Informative)
The Progress uses a multi-antenna radar system named KURS [wikipedia.org].
The ATV uses a specifically made video meter [sodern.fr] (PDF).
Re:Containers? (Score:3, Informative)
Soyuz = VW Beetle
Shuttle = tractor trailer
Perhaps a better comparison would be the Proton heavy [globalsecurity.org], which can push 44,100 lb to LEO, 12,100 lb to GTO, 4,850 lb to GEO. The Soyuz [globalsecurity.org] is 15,400 lb to LEO. Not all cargo needs to go up on a heavy, however, as the (relatively) cheap Soyuz do the job.
The shuttle, payload to 53,700 lb to LEO, 8,390 lb to GTO. It also goes EOL in two years, with optimistic hopes that the US heavy will actually fly in 2014.
Re:Non-reusable vehicles (Score:3, Informative)
The ISS is in low-earth orbit. So low that it requires propulsion to stay in orbit due to atmospheric drag. If you put more stuff up there you need more fuel to keep this in orbit so it is not for free to "park it close by". It is not going to stay there unless it is receiving a frequent boost from the friendly ATV, Progress or Shuttle.
Re:Grapple arm? (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.spacex.com/00Graphics/Videos/Dragon_ISS_Rendezvous.mpg [spacex.com]
Granted, it hasn't happened yet, but it sure is in the planning stages.
Re:Robots will take the sky away from you mere hum (Score:4, Informative)
Of course there is more to the issue that you fail to mention. Humans are extremely flexible and robots... aren't. Humans can make repairs on station... robots can't. Etc... Etc...
Then there is the issue of working speed - what it has taken three years for Spirit to accomplish would have taken a human geologist a mere three days.
Lets hope they are also smart enough to build an entire new electronics system for the Station as the passage through the Van Allen belts will fry it all. Lets also hope they come up with some new radiation shielding, as the station will be uninhabitable due to the increased radiation on the other side of the belt.
If having humans onboard was the reason why the trip was made so fast, you'd have a point.
Re:Automated? (Score:2, Informative)