Scientists Build Possibly The First Man-Made Genome 264
hackingbear writes "Wired is reporting that researchers have created the longest synthetic genome to date by threading together four long strands of DNA. 'Leading synthetic biologists said with the new work, published Thursday in the journal Science, the first synthetic life could be just months away — if it hasn't been created already. [...] The ability to synthesize longer DNA strands for less money parallels the history of genetic sequencing, where the price of sequencing a human genome has dropped from hundreds of millions of dollars to about $10,000. Just a few years ago, synthesizing a piece of DNA with 5,000 rungs in its helix, known as base-pairs, was impossible. Venter's new synthetic genome is 582,000 base-pairs.' As a programmer, I'm most excited by the possibility of a new platform and the programming jobs that will be created by it."
Thanks for the SuperFlu, Craig! (Score:3, Insightful)
Impossible? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Thanks for the SuperFlu, Craig! (Score:5, Insightful)
Wonderful (Score:4, Insightful)
Geez. The LAST thing society needs is a bunch of synthesized clones running around with hacked up spaghetti code for genes.
An omission (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Thanks for the SuperFlu, Craig! (Score:5, Insightful)
So far, all that's happened is some assorted earthtone sludge.
Biology as the next Programming language (Score:2, Insightful)
Just because we CAN do something doesn't mean we SHOULD. Perhaps if we constructed a complete corpus of biological effects, and dependencies of all currently known sequences (yeah right, like we're going to sequence every living organism on the planet) we could at least reasonably predict what the effect of NEW sequences might be. Until then the human race is the three-year-old. The gun is loaded. (waiting for the bang...)
Dennis Dumont
Procedural Abstraction (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Thanks for the SuperFlu, Craig! (Score:3, Insightful)
Monster Debugging (Score:2, Insightful)
And who's going to debug all the billions of self-reproducing monsters you unleash into the world, pray tell?
Re:Thanks for the SuperFlu, Craig! (Score:2, Insightful)
So a car or a backpack could be very good delivery devices for small enough nukes. You don't even need to be suicidal, you can just leave one somewhere. And suicidal people are not that rare; they weren't even before the current Muslim craze.
9/11 was such a big deal because it's hard to cause that much damage. You need a good plan and a lot of dedicated people to hijack plane and fly it into a building, even if you have access to guns or normal bombs.
Imagine for the sake of argument that a nuke was as easy to own as a gun is now. Of course, for rational people with something to loose they would be a good deterrent against aggression. Nukes work (almost) as an anti-aggression deterrent amongst the countries that have them, because the complexities of government tend to average out the crazies. But just barely. They don't stop anyone who doesn't care if they die, though, and there are plenty of crazies in the world.
Re:Procedural Abstraction -- Prolog? (Score:3, Insightful)
Sounds to me like programming in Prolog.
For those who don't know... A Prolog program is a set of patterns and actions. When a pattern is "matched" it action occures. The set is unordered. A more modern and more widely used version of this is the language "Erlang". I think Erlang points to the way we will write very large systems in the future. For one thing it scales well to systems that have many, many cores. Procedural languages just don't scale so well. Also I think this style of programming could be adapted to formal methods, proof of correctness and so on.
Back to DNA. I think DNA simply reacts to patterns in it's environment with all of the DNA "looking" for these patterns pretty much in parallel
Re:Thanks for the SuperFlu, Craig! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Ewww! (Score:2, Insightful)
As a programmer, I can assure you that the first code implemented this platform that says "Hello World!" is going to excite you witless.
Namgge
Re:Thanks for the SuperFlu, Craig! (Score:4, Insightful)
We are the grey goo. The plants and the bacteria had a good go at spreading all over Earth, but we spread further and faster than any previous life. The "grey goo scenario" is limited by the assumption that energy is abundant, and indeed energy (food) shortages are all that stops us covering every inch of the world.
I, for one, welcome my fellow grey goo overlords.