Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Solar Cycle 24 Has Started 258

radioweather writes "Solar physicists have been waiting for the appearance of a reversed-polarity sunspot to signal the start of the next solar cycle. As of Friday, that wait is over. A magnetically reversed, high-latitude sunspot emerged on the surface of the sun. Just a few months ago, an 'All Quiet Alert' had been issued for the sun. This reversed-polarity sunspot marks the beginning of the sun's return back to Solar Maximum. Solar Cycle 24 has been the subject of much speculation due to competing forecasts on whether it will be a highly active or a quiet low cycle. If it is a low cycle, it may very well be a test of validity for some CO2 based global warming theories. Only time will tell."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Solar Cycle 24 Has Started

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Impossible (Score:5, Informative)

    by Frozen Void ( 831218 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @10:51AM (#21932104) Homepage
    Reversed Polarity is just change from + to - or south to north. Nothing magical about it.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle [wikipedia.org]
    The physical basis of the solar cycle was elucidated in the early twentieth century by George Ellery Hale and collaborators, who in 1908 showed that sunspots were strongly magnetized (this was the first detection of magnetic fields outside the Earth), and in 1919 went on to show that the magnetic polarity of sunspot pairs:

            * is always the same in a given solar hemisphere throughout a given sunspot cycle;
            * is opposite across hemispheres throughout a cycle;
            * reverses itself in both hemispheres from one sunspot cycle to the next.
  • by Mathiasdm ( 803983 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @10:52AM (#21932118) Homepage
    Actually, 'climate change' is preferred instead of 'global warming' since it's very much possible that, while the average worldwide temperature is expected to increase, the temperature could decrease in some locations (Example: Gulf stream slowing down causing Europe to become colder)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06, 2008 @10:56AM (#21932132)
    No, scientists use the term "global climate change" because it more accurately describes what may happen in the future than "global warming." Yes, on average the surface of the earth has been getting warmer globally [nasa.gov], but it does not mean the entire world will just experience slightly warmer summers and winters. Just a few degrees centigrade has the ability to change ocean currents, wind patterns, and other natural events that regulate our climate.
  • by gEvil (beta) ( 945888 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @11:33AM (#21932360)
    Right again, whether or not we're responsible for it, i.e. whether or not it's Anthromorphic.

    Well, anthromorphic isn't even a word. I'm sure you meant to type anthropomorphic, which would then mean that we're attributing human characteristics to global warming. That doesn't make much sense, though. The word you want is anthropogenic.
  • Re:Impossible (Score:4, Informative)

    by QuickFox ( 311231 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @11:37AM (#21932378)

    Reversed Polarity is just change from + to - or south to north. Nothing magical about it.
    But of course. That's obvious. Which means it's a joke. How can anyone take such a comment seriously? On slashdot of all places? And it was modded down too!

    I think we've been invaded by non-slashdotter aliens.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06, 2008 @12:02PM (#21932558)
    More solar activity means better propogation at higher frequencies. For Example, 21 MHz, 28, MHz, and 50 MHz bands open up for long distance HF communication. But during periods of low sunspot activity these bands may only be usable for local communications.
  • Re:Impossible (Score:3, Informative)

    by mindwhip ( 894744 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @12:51PM (#21932922)
    *sigh* its Doctor Who... and the correct quote is reverse the polarity of the neutron flow". Star Trek stole the idea later....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Doctor [wikipedia.org]
  • by oneiros27 ( 46144 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @02:00PM (#21933502) Homepage
    Because it's convenient. Just as with the arbitrary number for the UNIX epoch, the Carrington rotation [wikipedia.org] number, the NOAA active region [nasa.gov] numbers, and the solar cycle number are just sequential starting at an arbitrary time.

    (okay, ARs cycled at 10,000 in 2002 so it's only 4 digits, but it's still a sequence)
  • by Captain Nitpick ( 16515 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @06:29PM (#21935794)

    Warning: From sources I'm too lazy too look up, I hear a very small percentage of people are not susceptible to the HIV virus.

    Mutation of the CCR5 gene [wikipedia.org] (CCR5 delta 32). The mutation is present in some 10% of Europeans and provides a level of resistance to HIV infection (but not total immunity). The mutation seems to decrease susceptibility to smallpox and bubonic plague, while increasing susceptibility to West Nile virus.

  • by baileydau ( 1037622 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @08:55PM (#21937028)

    Australia has coldest June ever
     
    Yes, we did have a cold winter this year (here in North Queensland, and many other places as well), but overall, 2007 was one of the hottest years on record. See: http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/silo/reg/cli_chg/timeseries.cgi?variable=tmean&region=aus&season=0112 [bom.gov.au] (this graph shows annual mean temperature anomaly (base 1961-1990))

    According to my "optical integrator", it appears to be about 4th or 5th hottest

  • by Brickwall ( 985910 ) on Monday January 07, 2008 @08:25AM (#21940880)
    the liberals you think are trying to scam you aren't rich, and none of them have anything to gain by advancing the idea of global climate change.

    Um, you are aware that Al Gore is a partner in the largest carbon-trading firm in the world, aren't you? And that as such, he has a vested interest in promoting carbon offsets because it will make him rich? Not that he's doing so badly, collecting $25k-$100k for his speaking engagements, a big chunk of change from the Nobel committee, and a few bucks from "A Convenient Lie".

    Meanwhile, over 100 respected climate scientists recently signed a report stating the AGW thesis is quite flawed. But don't let the facts get in the way of your closed mind.

"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson

Working...